| ²é¿´: 1783 | »Ø¸´: 4 | ||
simply0518ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Journal of Separation Science Éó¸åÒâ¼ûRejected with Option to Resubmit £¬¸ÃÕ¦°ì ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
Journal of Separation Science Éó¸åÒâ¼ûRejected with Option to Resubmit £¬¸ÃÕ¦°ì£¬¹òÇó¸ßÈËÖ¸µã£¬ÓÐÏ£Íûû£¬´óÐÞºóÖØÍ¶»¹ÊǸÄͶÆäËûÔÓÖ¾£¬ÒòΪ¾Ý˵2015Äê¸ÃÔÓÖ¾¸Ä¸ïÉó¸å¸üÑϸñ£¬ÂíÉÏÐÞ»ØÒ²ºÜÄÑ¡£ In view of the criticisms of the reviewers, I regret to inform you that I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Journal of Separation Science. The comments of the reviewers are enclosed at the bottom of this message or attached to this email. However, a strongly revised version of your manuscript that takes into account the comments of the reviewers will be reconsidered for publication. If you choose to do this, please submit your re-worked manuscript as a new paper at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jss in your Submitting Author Center Please indicate the number of THIS paper (jssc.201401361) in the field "previous Submission" in step 5 of the submission process. Please note that submitting your re-worked manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your revision may be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is rendered. Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to the Journal of Separation Science. I look forward to receiving your re-worked submission Best regards, Dr. Frantisek Svec Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Separation Science fsvec@lbl.gov Referee(s)' and Associate Editors Comments to Author (Please note that these comments may have been delivered to us as files - these are attached to this email and can be found in your Author Center) Reviewer: 1 Questions as follows: 1. The problem of format: name of all kinds of traditional Chinese medicine should be in italics; Some text size is not unified, such as the size of ¡°ethanol¡± in abstract is small, also appear elsewhere in this paper several times; The full name should be given for an abbreviation when it is first used, such as NMR, CE, etc; In section 2.3, " A Acquity" and please check in full. 2. The composition and efficacy of the Chinese traditional medicine prescription has described in the section of introduction, which do not need to be in abstract again. 3. Please explain why only in the proportion of ethanol extract prescription medicine? What effects of other percentage of extraction solvent? 4. In figure 1 (AB), in addition to the analysis of the 56 peak, there are other peaks, but why not analyze these peaks? Those are the new generated, or what kind of prescription of traditional Chinese medicine effective component? Seems to explain the peaks would help for a thorough knowledge of the chemical composition of the prescription. 5. The work described that this method of UPLC - TOF - MS has high sensitivity, but the paper did not mentioned in detail the quantitative analysis of 56 kinds of chemicals, and can't get the data such as linear range, LOD, also the paper lack of actual samples analysis. Reviewer: 2 Chen et al. developed a method of UPLC-Q-TOF-MS for the determination of major components of a Chinese herbal prescription named Qixue Shuangbu Tincture (QXSBT). It was claimed that 56 components including chalcones, triterpenoids, protopanaxatriol, flavones and flavanones were identified. After I read through this manuscript carefully, I found this paper is interesting and well organized. I would like to recommend the publication of this well-written paper in the Journal of Separation Science. Associate Editor This manuscript cannot be considered for publication in JSS at its present form as indicated by the comments from reviewers. Please revise it carefully, and then resubmit. It should be reviewed as a new manuscript. Date Sent: 24-Dec-2014 |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á0703
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Áº³ÉΰÀÏʦ¿ÎÌâ×é»¶ÓÄãµÄ¼ÓÈë
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
»·¾³¹¤³Ìµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
326Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985£¬±¾¿Æ211£¬0817»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ319Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
½ñÄêµÄ¹ú»ù½ðÊÇ´ò·ÖÖÆÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ËÕÖÝ´óѧ²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì£¨085601£©×¨Ë¶ÓпÆÑоÀúÈýÏî¹ú½±Á½¸öʵÓÃÐÍרÀûÒ»ÏîÊ¡¼¶Á¢Ïî
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
±¾ÈË¿¼085602 »¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì ר˶
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
journal of separation science Ͷ¸å¾Àú·ÖÏí
ÒѾÓÐ30È˻ظ´
¹ØÓڻظ´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û£¡wiley Journal of Separation Science
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
cpluto
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 121 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1845.6
- É¢½ð: 154
- ºì»¨: 28
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 538
- ÔÚÏß: 95.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2530386
- ×¢²á: 2013-07-03
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÏà¹Ø½»²æÁìÓò
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
simply0518(×Ô˽µÄè1988´ú·¢): ½ð±Ò+2, ¹ÄÀø½»Á÷ 2015-01-24 14:56:53
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
simply0518(×Ô˽µÄè1988´ú·¢): ½ð±Ò+2, ¹ÄÀø½»Á÷ 2015-01-24 14:56:53
| ¿´Á˼¸¸öÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬¸Ð¾õ˵µÄ¶¼Í¦ÊµÔڵġ£Â¥Ö÷Ó¦¸ÃÏȸù¾ÝÒâ¼û×ÐϸÐÞ¸ÄÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒÒ²Óöµ½¹ýÕâ¸öÇé¿ö£¬ ºóÀ´ÊÇÖØÐÂÑ¡µÄÔÓÖ¾¡£²»¹ý¿´ÂÛ̳µÄ³æ×ÓÃÇ˵µÄ£¬re-subºó¸øÐ޸ĵĻú»áÒ²ºÜ´ó¡£Â¥Ö÷±ð·ÅÆú£¬×£ºÃÔË£¡ |

2Â¥2014-12-25 12:13:26
ljq158
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 227 (´óѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 19119.9
- É¢½ð: 2519
- ºì»¨: 42
- Ìû×Ó: 6705
- ÔÚÏß: 2088Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1681876
- ×¢²á: 2012-03-11
- רҵ: »¯¹¤ÏµÍ³¹¤³Ì
3Â¥2015-02-12 08:45:33
simply0518
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3049.5
- É¢½ð: 20
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 255
- ÔÚÏß: 224Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2694927
- ×¢²á: 2013-10-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÖÐÒ©ÅÚÖÆ
4Â¥2015-02-12 12:29:11
Mei221991
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 160 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 11198.2
- É¢½ð: 192
- ºì»¨: 27
- Ìû×Ó: 1417
- ÔÚÏß: 1149.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1755068
- ×¢²á: 2012-04-14
- רҵ: ÎÞ»ú·Ç½ðÊô»ù¸´ºÏ²ÄÁÏ
5Â¥2015-02-12 12:40:56













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥