24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1066  |  回复: 2

莲子爱国

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] Applied Mathematics and Computation投稿求助 已有1人参与

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: In this paper, the authors discuss the information security about the constructions of perfect authentication codes. They proposed three methods for constructions of perfect authentication codes.
The paper is well organized and clearly written. I think their work gives some novel results of constructions of perfect authentication codes. I feel the following modifications are to be made to make it finally acceptable one:

1. To illustrate the difference of the third methods and second kinds of methods, and illustrates the advantages of the third methods.

2. Please give the advantage of three kinds of method to construct of perfect authentication codes respectively.

3. Please give some simulations, provide the chart comparison shows.

4. English needs further improvement.



Reviewer #2: The paper under review provides three constructions of  perfect authentication codes from the projective ge-
ometry over finite fields. The paper is meaningful and I do not find anything wrong there however, there are many spelling errors and the authors should  revise the paper carefully.
技术审核之后四五个月后回来的修稿意见。但是我感觉第一个审稿专家应该是计算方向不是数学的,他应该没有读懂我的文章。我们这个方向没有人做过仿真,也不知道该具体仿真仿什么呢?老板现在强制要求做仿真,啥也不会。不知道该怎么吧。
求大神们给点意见。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
确定一下是否真的需要做仿真,不需要的话委婉地跟审稿人说明,最好有依据什么的
看文章大体除了语言没什么大问题了
2楼2014-10-22 14:41:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

莲子爱国

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 自私的猫1988 at 2014-10-22 14:41:30
确定一下是否真的需要做仿真,不需要的话委婉地跟审稿人说明,最好有依据什么的
看文章大体除了语言没什么大问题了

我觉得不需要,但是老板一定要求按照审稿人意见完成。不知道该怎么办。
3楼2014-10-27 08:57:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 莲子爱国 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见