| 查看: 1962 | 回复: 27 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
论文被拒，自己心服口服。
|
|||
|
如题，看了审稿意见，自己的确心服口服。虽然文章没有毛病，但是水平达不到啊，骚年，加油吧！不要灰心 The advice to consider another journal is sound. The following includes some additional input from the reviewer, conveyed after further communication with the associate editor. This input further clarifies that while the manuscript makes some contributions, those are mainly incremental in nature and better suited for other venues. The associate editor agrees with that view and does not recommend publication in CORROSION: The reviewer noted: The article is quite basic (although accurate) and most of the information and conclusions are known, have been the standard analysis for years and are taught in NACE basic/advanced classes and publications. The use of BEM software for modeling and the conclusions do however provide some additional verification of we have observed for years. As an example the simple case of two parallel pipelines and a CP anode in figure 3 results in a prediction of current pickup near the anode and current discharge upstream and downstream on the foreign pipeline. This has been known for years (see pages 29 and 136 fig. 12-2, A. W. Peabody, "Control of Pipeline Corrosion", 1968" and manual soil voltage gradient calculations to estimate the effects are routinely used by CP practitioners. Field testing is always required in the complex real would to mitigate interference issues. The reviewer does not see how this article provides a meaningful step forward in the understanding of CP interference. The reviewer feels this article does not meet the criterion of scientific advancement for publication in the Corrosion Journal. The reviewer feels the article would be better suited for Materials Performance where the readers are interested in application and verification of what is observed in the field (the commercial concern remains). |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有6人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有12人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
哪位高人中了，把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看，让我长长见识
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有5人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有7人回复
-
申请删除本帖
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 论文意见回来，这是被拒了吗
已经有43人回复
- 论文被拒，这段话什么意思呢？
已经有12人回复
- 论文被拒，请各位帮给看一下主要什么原因
已经有5人回复
- 论文被拒，求指导和安慰
已经有9人回复
- 最近论文总被拒啊
已经有132人回复
- IET论文被拒了，该如何是好
已经有25人回复
- 论文被拒审是什么意思啊 （有图）
已经有6人回复
- 论文返修后被拒，求帮忙看看拒信
已经有27人回复
- 请问论文被拒以后如何写argument
已经有11人回复
- 论文被拒后 如何申诉？
已经有16人回复
- 被其他期刊拒稿后，投到另外一个期刊，被主编认为一稿多投，求帮助
已经有43人回复
- 文章被拒后重投，被拒的几率是不是更大？
已经有14人回复
- 论文被拒申诉成功，以后的步骤是什么
已经有8人回复
- 请问大家，投稿被拒后，能不能修改后再重新投！
已经有10人回复
- 论文被拒 修改之后可不可以再投原杂志
已经有13人回复
- 主题已被删除
已经有32人回复
- 论文被拒，怎样申诉
已经有21人回复
9楼2014-10-22 10:06:06
简单回复
yuguiyan2楼
2014-10-22 09:57
回复
shangxingbin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
， [ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
2014-10-22 10:01
回复
shangxingbin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
