| 查看: 794 | 回复: 5 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者chemtian将赠送您 1 个金币 | ||
chemtian金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
论文要找老外润色怎么办？
|
|
|
我投德国的一个英文期刊，审稿人已经推荐接收，但却要求我找一个老外润色（a polishing by a native speaker),以前投其它刊物都没有这种情况（接收后都由语言编辑帮忙完成了，这刊物太懒啦），不知怎么办？有英文高人愿意帮忙polishing吗？或者给一个建议，谢谢 [ Last edited by chemtian on 2008-5-1 at 10:32 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
实验室接单子
已经有7人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有11人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有5人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
-
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有12人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
2楼2008-05-01 10:43:41
zwghuochetou
禁言 (著名写手)
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
3楼2008-05-01 19:03:48
4楼2008-05-12 18:11:25
5楼2008-05-12 18:38:44
xdweld
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4201.7
- 散金: 115
- 帖子: 798
- 在线: 324.4小时
- 虫号: 261124
- 注册: 2006-06-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 零件加工制造
一篇英文欧陶的润色 金币感谢
|
审稿意见如下， 我先认真改一遍，请虫友润色，金币大量的感谢！先提前征友，有意者联系。 I have now received a referee's report on the paper which you have kindly submitted to the Journal of the European Ceramic Society. Comments it contains are given below. The referee has recognised that interesting and original results have been put forward in your paper. In view of the problems identified, however, I regret that I cannot accept the paper in its current form Reviewer #1: The authors describe some results that might be of interest for the varistor community but major rewriting is needed for the paper to be acceptable. 1. The discussion is hard to follow because of the English writing. In some places it is impossible to understand what is meant. The English must be improved greatly before this manuscript is accepted. Other compulsory revisions are the following: 2. The text describes the data presented in the figures 2-5, but there is no discussion about the possible reasons for such behavior. This is important to include. Reviewer #1: 1. The English in the paper needs correcting by a genuinely native standard English speaker as some sentences do not make sense at present. e.g. "When the temperature is below 1100?, the densification degree of the Bi2O3 is much more important than the reduction of the density due to the vaporization of Bi2O3." does not make sense. 2. Some references are "et al.". This is not permitted in this Journal. 3. In refs 11 and 12 "De RM" should not be abbreviated like this. |
6楼2008-08-11 12:28:53