| 查看: 834 | 回复: 5 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者chemtian将赠送您 1 个金币 | ||
chemtian金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
论文要找老外润色怎么办？
|
|
|
我投德国的一个英文期刊，审稿人已经推荐接收，但却要求我找一个老外润色（a polishing by a native speaker),以前投其它刊物都没有这种情况（接收后都由语言编辑帮忙完成了，这刊物太懒啦），不知怎么办？有英文高人愿意帮忙polishing吗？或者给一个建议，谢谢 [ Last edited by chemtian on 2008-5-1 at 10:32 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有9人回复
-
CSC & MSCA 博洛尼亚大学能源材料课题组博士/博士后招生｜MSCA经费充足、排名优
已经有6人回复
-
天津大学招2026.09的博士生，欢迎大家推荐交流（博导是本人）
已经有4人回复
-
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗
已经有3人回复
-
退学或坚持读
已经有28人回复
-
面上项目申报
已经有3人回复
-
酰胺脱乙酰基
已经有9人回复
-
博士延得我，科研能力直往上蹿
已经有7人回复
-
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有5人回复
-
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有22人回复
2楼2008-05-01 10:43:41
zwghuochetou
禁言 (著名写手)
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
3楼2008-05-01 19:03:48
4楼2008-05-12 18:11:25
5楼2008-05-12 18:38:44
xdweld
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4201.7
- 散金: 115
- 帖子: 798
- 在线: 324.4小时
- 虫号: 261124
- 注册: 2006-06-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 零件加工制造
一篇英文欧陶的润色 金币感谢
|
审稿意见如下， 我先认真改一遍，请虫友润色，金币大量的感谢！先提前征友，有意者联系。 I have now received a referee's report on the paper which you have kindly submitted to the Journal of the European Ceramic Society. Comments it contains are given below. The referee has recognised that interesting and original results have been put forward in your paper. In view of the problems identified, however, I regret that I cannot accept the paper in its current form Reviewer #1: The authors describe some results that might be of interest for the varistor community but major rewriting is needed for the paper to be acceptable. 1. The discussion is hard to follow because of the English writing. In some places it is impossible to understand what is meant. The English must be improved greatly before this manuscript is accepted. Other compulsory revisions are the following: 2. The text describes the data presented in the figures 2-5, but there is no discussion about the possible reasons for such behavior. This is important to include. Reviewer #1: 1. The English in the paper needs correcting by a genuinely native standard English speaker as some sentences do not make sense at present. e.g. "When the temperature is below 1100?, the densification degree of the Bi2O3 is much more important than the reduction of the density due to the vaporization of Bi2O3." does not make sense. 2. Some references are "et al.". This is not permitted in this Journal. 3. In refs 11 and 12 "De RM" should not be abbreviated like this. |
6楼2008-08-11 12:28:53