24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 802  |  回复: 14
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhaosong6638

铁虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 悲剧

文章投Am,修改后悲剧,投ACSnano Nanoscale JPCC 都没送审,怎么搞的
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

贪睡的猫

金虫 (正式写手)

估计又是忽悠人的纳米材料的文章吧?

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
5楼2014-10-04 19:06:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 15 个回答

霏凡蕊儿

版主 (文坛精英)

告别过去

优秀版主优秀版主

加油,再接再厉吧,相信自己可以,祝您好运
过去事,莫思量;未来事,莫愿莫求;现在事,与一切事但知无着。
2楼2014-10-04 18:55:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaosong6638

铁虫 (小有名气)

Papers published in Nanoscale must present insightful, novel, very high-quality science, which should be of significant general interest. In this case, although we have no doubts that your analysis on the synthesis of CNT-Ag hybrid aerogels and their applications as strain gauge sensors is thorough and technically sound, it appears the results are better suited for a more specialized journal instead.
3楼2014-10-04 18:59:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaosong6638

铁虫 (小有名气)

We thank you for submitting your paper to the Journal of Physical Chemistry.  Having examined your manuscript, I find that it deals primarily with the preparation and characterization of materials.  Due to the limited new physical insights in the work, we are returning it to you without review so that you may submit it to another journal.  Please understand that this decision does not in any way reflect negatively on the quality of your work, but rather is a judgment based on its appropriateness for our journal.
4楼2014-10-04 19:00:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见