| ²é¿´: 2317 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
lbq0802ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
µØÀíѧ£¬ÓÈÆäÊÇÈËÎĵØÀíѧµÄÑо¿Ä¿µÄºÍÑо¿ÒâÒåÔÚÓÚʲô£¿ ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
|
| µ±ÎÒÃÇÊÕ¼¯¸÷Àࡱ´ó¡°Êý¾Ý£¬Ì×Óø÷Àà·×·±¸´Ôӵķ½·¨£¬Ö®ºóΪÁ˸ñ¾Ö¶ø¸ñ¾Ö£¬ÎªÁ˽ṹ¶ø½á¹û£¬ÎªÁËÄ£ÐͶøÄ£ÐÍ£¬×îºóµÃµ½µÄÖ»ÊǶà²ÊµÄ¸ñ¾Öͼ£¬»òÊǸ÷ÀàÓÅ»¯²ßÂÔ¡£ÎÒÃÇÑо¿Ä¿µÄºÍÑо¿ÒâÒåÔÚÓÚʲô£¿ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
½øÈëISISºó£¬´ò²»¿ªÈκνçÃæ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
µØá£»·Á÷˵2.0
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
µØÖÊѧÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ224È˻ظ´
¼Æ»®Í¶×Ê2ÒÚµÄÌØÌá˹¼Æ»®¶¯Á¦»úÖÆÎÊÌ⣬ħ¶¼Ãñ¹¤ÌôÕ½ÖпÆÔºÏà¹ØÈËÔ±£¬ËµÄ¸üÓеÀÀí£¿
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
SCIENCE ADVANCEͶ¸å״̬×Éѯ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
µØÀíѧÖеĽâÊÍ
ÒѾÓÐ49È˻ظ´
ÈËÎĵØÀíѧµÄSCI
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
ÈËÎĵØÀíѧÎÊÌâÇó½â´ð
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
×¼±¸±£ÑУ¬Ï£ÍûÁ˽âÖпÆÔºµØÀíËùÈËÎĵØÀíѧµÄÇé¿ö
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
°²»Õʦ·¶´óѧÈËÎĵØÀíרҵÑо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚдÈËÎĵØÀíѧÂÛÎÄ£¬µØÀíϵµÄǰ±²ÃǽøÀ´Ò»Ï£¬Ð»Ð»
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
¿¼ÈËÎĵØÀíѧ£¬Çó¸÷·ѧ³¤Ñ§½ãÖ¸µ¼
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
ÖпÆÔºº®ºµËù ÈËÎĵØÀíѧ
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚÈËÎĵØÀíרҵ¾ÍÒµ·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
ÈËÎĵØÀíѧ¿çרҵ¿¼²©
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
µØÀíѧÓÈÆäÊÇÈËÎĵØÀíѧÑо¿Öеġ°¿Õ¼äЧӦ¡±£¬ÇëÎʿռäЧӦÔõô½âÊÍ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¿¼ÈËÎĵØÀíѧ²©Ê¿»¹ÊÇÇøÓò¾¼Ãѧ²©Ê¿£¿
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Ç󻪶«Ê¦·¶´óѧÈËÎĵØÀíѧµÄרҵ¿ÎºÍ¸ßÊýBµÄÀúÄêÕæÌâ°¡
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÌæµÜµÜÇóÖúºþ±±´óѧÈËÎĵØÀíѧ¿¼Ñи´Ï°×ÊÁϼ°ÍùÄêÕæÌ⣡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÈËÎĵØÀíѧÂÃÓι滮·½Ïò¿¼²©
ÒѾÓÐ37È˻ظ´
zhuojiu
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 5432
- É¢½ð: 432
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 357
- ÔÚÏß: 195Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1544024
- ×¢²á: 2011-12-20
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÈËÎĵØÀíѧ
¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
|
ÎÒÊǰáש¹¤ °ÑÍõ·¨»ÔÀÏʦµÄÒ»¶Î»°°áש¹ýÀ´ The role of a field can be gauged by how much it is needed by other fields. Maths is considered the mother of natural sciences, so is economics to social sciences. Both are widely used in other fields (in terms of their theories and methods). The uniqueness of geography is its spatial focus. Jack Dangermond (ESRI president) once said that geography is more about context than contents. In other words, geography's value is no longer about what it covers, but about how it "does" science. What is geography's value to others (including both social and natural sciences)? Take GIS as an example. It is playing an increasingly major role in more fields (e.g., economics, sociology, public administration, planning etc. in the social science domain). This has brought geography back to Harvard. But it is not the traditional geography per se. One may question: so geography is only used by others. I here cite the quote from the movie "Last Emperor": "how bad is it to be useful?" Not to be afraid of being questioned that GIS and related methods are only tools. All man-made features are built by tools. Does geography also offer building materials? Yes, it is its spatial reasoning, i.e., the way we form concept spatially. The future of science lies in the borders between sciences. That is why interdisciplinary fields are the most active and productive areas. One may also identify that the most successful geographers are not necessarily 100% geographers by training. "Migrants" between fields (taking geography somewhere in their career path) often make the most significant contributions to geography itself. Do not limit your scope fo studies by the field name you have chosen, rather expand your pursuit by the usefulness of the fields. |
2Â¥2014-09-12 11:54:06
ÍõԴͬѧ
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 203.4
- É¢½ð: 127
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 104
- ÔÚÏß: 8.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3266763
- ×¢²á: 2014-06-10
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ×ÔÈ»µØÀíѧ

3Â¥2014-09-14 11:36:57













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥