| 查看: 2947 | 回复: 7 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
文武小新银虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
求助：有关JNR这个期刊的Scientific Justification如何撰写 已有2人参与
|
|
|
各位虫友，实在是没办法了，文章被打回来三次了，Journal of Nanoparticle Research，所以问下大家是个什么情况。 第一次我确实没有提交Scientific Justification这个文件，于是被打了回来： Your submission entitled "XXX" has been received. Before we can further process it, you are kindly requested to include scientific justification to your submission and re-submit the paper online. The Journal of Nanoparticle Research receives a large number of submissions. In order to perform a complete editorial assessment and minimize the review time, the Editors require that the author completes the “Scientific Justification” with a clear statement of what is the main claim of the paper, what is novel about it, why it is relevant and how the results advance the field. We kindly ask you to provide this in order to fulfill the submission process. 于是乎我写好了Scientific Justification，提交，又被打了回来： Your submission entitled "XXX" has been received. Before we can further process it, you are kindly requested to make the following changes and re-submit online. 1. “The Journal of Nanoparticle Research receives a large number of submissions. In order to perform a complete editorial assessment and minimize the review time, the Editors require that the author completes the “Scientific Justification” with a clear statement of what is the main claim of the paper, what is novel about it, why it is relevant and how the results advance the field. We kindly ask you to provide this in order to fulfill the submission process”. 我认为可能是我写的不太对？于是就又改了一下Scientific Justification，这次写的更充实一些了，结果又被打回来了： Your submission entitled "XXX" has been received. Before we can further process it, you are kindly requested to consider the following changes and re-submit online. 1. “The Journal of Nanoparticle Research receives a large number of submissions. In order to perform a complete editorial assessment and minimize the review time, the Editors require that the author completes the “Scientific Justification” with a clear statement of what is the main claim of the paper, what is novel about it, why it is relevant and how the results advance the field. We kindly ask you to provide this in order to fulfill the submission process”. 这次意见跟上次一模一样，现在有两个问题： 1、是我写的Scientific Justification不符合期刊的要求吗？基本上就是按照cover letter的模式写的，而且这个期刊不要求提交cover letter.如果有投过这个期刊的虫友热切需要你们的帮助啊，还有就是写过这个文件的虫友能否告知一下这个文件到底该怎么写？ 2、投稿系统中没有专门的提交Scientific Justification这一项的提示，在上传文件的时候只有Manuscript、attachment to manuscript、Supplementary material (audio/video files etc)这三个类型，我将Scientific Justification提交到第二个文件类型下，不知道是不是因为这个原因。 谢谢大家~~ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有7人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有22人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有60人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有10人回复
-
filecode
已经有12人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有13人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有7人回复
-
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有13人回复
-
各位道友，我要去昆明玩几天，回来见。
已经有8人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有22人回复
文武小新
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1351.2
- 散金: 525
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 239
- 在线: 162.3小时
- 虫号: 2267494
- 注册: 2013-01-30
- 专业: 生物大分子结构与功能
5楼2014-09-12 09:46:58
自私的猫1988
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4800 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 6.746
- 金币: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 红花: 256
- 沙发: 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在线: 1473.7小时
- 虫号: 2004083
- 注册: 2012-09-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
文武小新: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案, sb 2014-09-12 09:44:42
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
文武小新: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案, sb 2014-09-12 09:44:42
|
During the submission process authors will be asked to suggest two names of qualified referees and to provide a scientific justification paragraph, to explain why the paper provides a significant advancement to the field of nanostructured materials. 这个应该是在提交主文件之前的阶段需要写上的，不是在提交文稿文件的时候 |
2楼2014-09-09 17:24:34
3楼2014-09-11 19:32:35
4楼2014-09-11 19:37:12
