24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1126  |  回复: 8
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

QINJUNS

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 向自然子刊投稿的失败经历

通过对核实验数据的大量分析,在壳模型和结团模型的基础上,建立了一个原子核的三维模型。这个模型在核自旋、宇称和结合能的解释方面都比壳模型有了更大的成功(有大量的数据支持), 因此,斗胆投给自然子刊"自然物理"。收到收稿信后的15天,我收到了编辑的拒稿信。
下面贴出来请大家给看一下:
Dear Dr Qin
Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "The three-dimensional structure of atomic nuclei". However, we regret that we are unable to publish it in Nature.
It is Nature's policy to decline a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees, so that they may be sent elsewhere without delay. Decisions of this kind are made by the editorial staff when it appears that papers are unlikely to succeed in the competition for limited space.
Among the considerations that arise at this stage are the length of a manuscript, its likely interest to a general readership of scientists, the pressure on space in the various fields of Nature's interest and the likelihood that a manuscript would seem of great topical interest to those working in the same or related areas of science.
In the present case, while your proposed nuclear model may prove stimulating to fellow specialists, I regret that we are unable to conclude that the paper provides a sufficiently clear advance in scientific understanding to be likely to excite the immediate interest of researchers in a broad range of other disciplines. We therefore feel that the present paper would find a more appropriate outlet in a specialist journal, rather than Nature.
I am sorry that we cannot respond more positively, but I hope that you will rapidly receive a more favourable response elsewhere.
Yours sincerely Dr Karen SouthwellSenior Editor

请大家给个意见,如果想让这样的论文发表的话,下一步我该怎么办?谢谢!
如果有学核物理的前辈,有兴趣的话我可提供论文原稿供指正。
[search]核模型[/search]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ddforks

铜虫 (小有名气)

我看了一下,他们想表达的应该是说,你这篇文章太专业,而自然是一个能让大部分人看了后获得灵感的杂志,这个“大部分”人应该是不同学科的。如果文章太专业的话,普及面就太窄了。邮件后面也说了,建议你投比较专业的期刊,并且祝你早日获得录用。
其实自然这么做也是对的,起码我觉得理念是对的,呵呵,文章不求有多专,但求能给大部分人指引路。表明这个杂志是一个特别重视基础的杂志,就跟大树的根一样,如果你的论文是描述根的,估计它就要了。如果单纯描述叶子,不是说描述叶子不对,而是说太专业了。那被自然重视度就应该不大了。
4楼2009-01-19 09:42:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 9 个回答

f0008


M龙(金币+1,VIP+0):也给你一个安慰奖!
这封信完全是套话, 我有一封几乎一模一样的

错了,是完全一样的
2楼2008-04-19 03:09:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

downbuliao

金虫 (小有名气)

The key for nature is broad interest, at least the editor should think the submitted paper has. The paper may be very important in a specific field, nature is picky to some specific fields. You may think about how to present you results in a broad interest and try again.  Good luck.
3楼2008-04-19 04:52:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangxiaotao

铁虫 (正式写手)

自然的文章要短小精悍,趣味性,重大发现或突破。
喜欢火,红红的火苗向上窜动,心情也随之激动。。。
5楼2009-01-19 09:49:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见