24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3904  |  回复: 22
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zpdanalyst

铜虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 因英语不好被编辑直接拒稿,但又加了一句话,是客气还是真的希望回馈评论? 已有12人参与

如题。一个暑假都在弄这篇文章,学生也没回家。个人感觉已经尽最大努力了,而且自我还比较满意文章内容,但是编辑直接拒了(Expired Revisions and Manuscripts No Longer Under Consideration):-(。巨郁闷!加粗的这句话是客气还是真的希望回馈意见?大家碰到过吗?

Thank you for considering Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research for your manuscript submission. In reviewing the manuscript, I concluded that the English is not suitable for Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

As you can appreciate, we cannot publish a large fraction of the manuscripts we receive, so we are most interested in those that clearly present new and novel ideas of interest to a general readership. It is our opinion that the material presented in this manuscript is not suitable for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. We will be more than glad to receive any comments you have with regard to this assessment.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider this work for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zpdanalyst

铜虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by xdh930 at 2014-08-28 23:45:18
祝楼主下次成功!

many thanks
8楼2014-08-29 16:46:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zpdanalyst

铜虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by 自私的猫1988 at 2014-08-29 07:12:50
改投吧,编辑意见比较No Longer Under Consideration

也只有这样了
9楼2014-08-29 16:47:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zpdanalyst

铜虫 (正式写手)

谢谢!
12楼2014-08-30 03:11:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zpdanalyst

铜虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
22楼: Originally posted by lichao5263 at 2014-09-01 21:39:20
我觉得编辑只是找个借口而已,但这借口太勉强了,而且有点打击人,个人感觉中国人的英语还不至于烂到完全不给机会“No Longer Under Consideration”,我也有遇到类似情况,虽说英语写作上有点小问题,但只要你idea ...

就是。我已经回信了,但没有下文。现在正在修改,准备改投其他了。希望能成功!到时候中了给大家报个信。
23楼2014-09-08 22:59:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zpdanalyst 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见