24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2612  |  回复: 62
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

mjbhlm

铁虫 (初入文坛)


[交流] 投RSI 编辑退稿,但是系统出现的还是可以重新投稿,大虾帮我看看呢

送完金币,求安慰,赞运气,今年运气很差!
Dear xx,

Your manuscript is returned to you because it is not sufficiently novel in the editor's opinion. For elaboration of the criteria for consideration I refer you to the General Editorial Policies for RSI available at: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/info/about

Sincerely,

Xinghua Lu
Associate Editor
Review of Scientific Instruments


Note from the Publisher
Please consider whether your manuscript would be more appropriate for AIP Advances (http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/adva). This rapid publication, open access journal covers all areas of applied physical science and features Creative Commons licensing and post-publication discussion. Peer review focuses on whether the manuscript is technically correct and original. Simply respond to this email message to request a transfer.

----------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
Manuscript #xxxxx:


Editor's Comments:
Authors report an analysis model for calculation of xxxxxxxx. It is not clear what is the innovation in respect of the instrumentation or experimental methods. Authors shall consider submit to a different journal.

但是文章的状态是“Waiting for Revised Manuscript from Author”,点击后面好像又是重新投稿?不知道怎么回事呢?
是不是还有机会申述或者什么的呢?本文其实主要内容是数学模型的建立哈,后面的实验的确没有太大的创新性,就是一般的性能测试!
还有就是投AIP Advances 一定会接受的嘛?等着文章毕业呢!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

caucola

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)



mjbhlm(金币+1): 谢谢参与
貌似改投 的可能性比较大啊。创新性不够
48楼2014-08-20 14:41:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 63 个回答

mjbhlm

铁虫 (初入文坛)


谢谢大家的关注,能否说点建议,看来今年的运气真是太差!
9楼2014-08-20 13:39:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
yuguiyan6楼
2014-08-20 13:29   回复  
mjbhlm(金币+1): 谢谢参与
[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
wanghuidsg11楼
2014-08-20 13:42   回复  
mjbhlm(金币+1): 谢谢参与
[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见