| 查看: 647 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
The top 50 living chemists in h-index
|
||
|
The top 50 living chemists in h-index, (#Nobel Laureate), The Chinese chemists: 70 Lee, Y. T.# 76 Physical (Nobel Laureate) 78 Que, L. 75 Bio (Taiwan) 86 Wong, C. H. 74 Organic (Taiwan) 315 Che, C. M. 57 Inorganic (Hong Kong) 352 Lin, M. C. 55 Physical (Taiwan) 480 Fu, G. C. 50 Organic (Mit Department of Chemistry) No one from china mainland ranges at top 500. 1 Whitesides, G. M. 135 Organic 2 Corey, E. J.# 132 Organic 3 Karplus, M. 129 Theoretical 4 Heeger, A. J.# 114 Organic 5 Wüthrich, K.# 113 Bio 6 Bax, A. 112 Bio 6 Hoffmann, R.# 112 Theoretical 8 Lehn, J. M. # 107 Organic 8 Schleyer, P. R. 107 Organic 9 Scheraga, H. A. 105 Bio 10 Bard, A. J. 104 Analytical 11 Schreiber, S. L. 102 Bio 12 Khorana, H. G.# 98 Bio 13 Fersht, A. R. 97 Bio 13 Gratzel, M. 97 Physical 15 Zare, R. N. 96 Physical 15 Lippard, S. J. 96 Inorganic 15 Trost, B. M. 96 Organic 18 Clore, G. M. 95 Bio 18 Gray, H. B. 95 Inorganic 18 Marks, T. J. 95 Inorganic 21 Seebach, D. 94 Organic 21 Evans, D. A. 94 Organic 23 Noyori, R.# 93 Organic 23 Schaefer, H. F. 93 Theoretical 23 Truhlar, D. G. 93 Theoretical 26 Ibers, J. A. 92 Inorganic 27 Meyer, T. J. 91 Inorganic 27 Somorjai, G.A. 91 Physical 29 Djerassi, C. 90 Organic 30 Jortner, J. 89 Theoretical 30 McConnell, H. M. 89 Bio 30 Nicolau, K. C. 89 Organic 30 Sharpless, K.B.# 89 Organic 34 Ingold, K. U. 88 Organic 34 Lerner, R. A. 88 Bio 36 Grubbs, R. H.# 87 Inorganic 36 Holm, R. H. 87 Inorganic 36 Lipscomb, W. N.# 87 Inorganic 36 Murray, R. W. 87 Analytical 36 Dobson, C. M. 86 Bio 41 Goddard, W. A. 85 Theoretical 41 Schrock, R. R.# 85 Inorganic 43 Breslow, R. 84 Organic 43 Frechet, J. M. 84 Organic 43 Houk, K. N. 84 Theoretical 43 Mann, M. 84 Analytical 43 Marcus, R. A.# 84 Theoretical 43 Miller, W. H. 84 Theoretical 49 Bartlett, R. J. 83 Theoretical 49 Ernst, R. R.# 83 Physical 49 Roberts, J. D. 83 Organic 49 Stucky, G. D. 83 Inorganic |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
[武汉纺织大学]材料学院[姜伟团队名称]课题组-2026年硕士研究生调剂信息
已经有0人回复
-
中国科学院·过程工程研究所·招聘海内外高层次人才---过程所“百人计划”
已经有1人回复
-
有机高分子材料论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有204人回复
-
中国科学院·过程工程研究所·招聘海内外高层次人才---过程所“百人计划”
已经有5人回复
-
2026考博自荐
已经有4人回复
-
温敏水凝胶收缩
已经有0人回复
-
PDMS膜在溶液中的离子透过率
已经有0人回复
-
攒人品 论文祈福
已经有139人回复
-
science advances的AAAS系统上返修
已经有0人回复
-
science advances的AAAS系统上返修问题
已经有2人回复
-
LDPE黑十字为什么那么大
已经有0人回复
2楼2008-04-08 17:19:27
|
Hirsch index ranks top chemists Living chemists have been ranked in a league table based on what some argue is the fairest measure of research achievement ever devised. Top of the 2000-strong pile is Harvard's E J Corey, fighting off competition from George Whitesides and Martin Karplus (both also Harvard). Completing the top five are Kurt Wüthrich and Alan Heeger, while the leading British chemist so far indexed, Alan Fersht, is placed at number 13. The full list is published on Chemistry World's website. The chemists were ranked by h-index, a number invented by physicist Jorge Hirsch in 2005 to measure research impact. A scientist's h-index is the highest number of papers they have published which have each amassed at least that number of citations: Corey, with an h of 132, has published 132 papers which have each received at least 132 citations, for example. By combining quantity and quality, Hirsch argued, the h-index avoids other measures' potential bias: counting total published papers can reward the hard-working but mediocre, while a highly-cited scientist may have inflated their reputation by writing review articles or by sneaking in as co-author on many papers. Henry Schaefer, of the University of Georgia, US, together with colleague Amy Peterson, created the rankings from the ISI Web of Science. The list is restricted to living chemists; otherwise John Pople (1925-2004), with an h of 137, would have come top. Schaefer admits that it is not yet comprehensive, and welcomes additions. Though the top 10 won't surprise anyone, said Schaefer, some Nobel prize winners are buried deep down in the table. E O Fischer, for example, squeezes in at joint 251st with an h of 60. That in part reflects the publication culture of previous decades; and in some cases, suggests Schaefer, because the Nobel prize is awarded for one achievement, while the h-index marks a whole career. Indeed, 'being old is a huge plus', Schaefer notes, as one's h-index can only rise with age. The average age of the top ten chemists is around 70; of the younger scientists, Ad Bax, who researches biophysical NMR spectroscopy at the US National Institutes of Health (aged 50, with an h of 111) is best placed to take the lead. H-indices also seem to vary between different fields of chemistry: of the top 104 in the list, there are 33 organic chemists and 21 inorganic, but just 5 analytical. Rough and ready as the h-index may be, it has captured the enthusiasm of many chemists, particularly in the US. While some, like Timothy Donohoe at Oxford University, see it as 'a bit of fun, really', Hirsch originally suggested that h-indices could inform funding or tenure decisions which might otherwise be more politically biased. French chemist Christian Bruneau, who works at the National Centre of Scientific Research (CNRS) in Paris, says he has been asked for his h-index (28) by some European research council programmes, and happily includes it on his CV. Nonetheless, says Dieter Lenoir, who works at the National Research Centre for Environment and Health (GSF) in Neuherberg, Germany, and is compiling a detailed list of all German chemists' h-indices, one's h-index doesn't take into account great teaching or great book-writing; while University of Georgia chemistry head John Stickney, who asked his entire faculty for their h-indices, says they should be 'taken with a gram of salt'. 'I don't think you should get hung up on them, but you can't ignore them', Richard Catlow, head of chemistry at University College, London, told Chemistry World. |
3楼2008-04-08 18:02:06
4楼2008-04-08 18:13:07
20