±±¾©Ê¯ÓÍ»¯¹¤Ñ§Ôº2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á¹«¸æ
²é¿´: 411  |  »Ø¸´: 0

zsh5225

ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

[ÇóÖú] ÕªÒª£¬Ó¢Ò뺺£¬Ð»Ð»ÁË¡£

Wavelength converter placement under different RWA algorithms in wavelength-routed all-optical networks
Abstract: Sparse wavelength conversion and appropriate routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) algorithms are the two key factors in improving the blocking performance in wavelength-routed all-optical networks. It has been shown that the optimal placement of a limited number of wavelength converters in an arbitrary mesh network is an NP-complete problem. There have been various heuristic algorithms proposed in the literature, in which most of them assume that a static routing and random-wavelength assignment RWA algorithm is employed. However, the existing work shows that fixed-alternate routing and dynamic routing RWA algorithms can achieve much better blocking performance. Our study further demonstrates that the wavelength converter placement and RWA algorithms are closely related in the sense that a well-designed wavelength converter placement mechanism for a particular RWA algorithm might not work well with a different RWA algorithm. Therefore, the wavelength converter placement and the RWA have to be considered jointly. The objective of this paper is to investigate the wavelength converter placement problem under the fixed-alternate routing (FAR) algorithm and least-loaded routing (LLR) algorithm. Under the FAR algorithm, we propose a heuristic algorithm called minimum blocking probability first for wavelength converter placement. Under the LLR algorithm, we propose another heuristic algorithm called weighted maximum segment length. The objective of the converter placement algorithms is to minimize the overall blocking probability. Extensive simulation studies have been carried out over three typical mesh networks, including the 14-node NSFNET, 19-node EON, and 38-node CTNET. We observe that the proposed algorithms not only outperform existing wavelength converter placement algorithms by a large margin, but they also can achieve almost the same performance compared with full wavelength conversion under the same RWA algorithm.

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

ŬÁ¦¾ÍÓÐÊÕ»ñ
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ zsh5225 µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©273Çóµ÷¼Á +6 ÀóÌâÄÏǽ 2026-04-05 6/300 2026-04-06 08:35 by zhangdingwa
[¿¼ÑÐ] »¯Ñ§357·Ö£¬¿¼Ñе÷¼Á +11 .Starry. 2026-04-04 12/600 2026-04-06 06:28 by houyaoxu
[¿¼ÑÐ] 070300»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶311·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +9 Áº¸»¹óÏÕÖÐÇó 2026-04-04 9/450 2026-04-06 06:24 by houyaoxu
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0855Çóµ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏ +11 ºìÌÒׯׯ 2026-04-04 11/550 2026-04-05 22:13 by ×íÎÌwl
[¿¼ÑÐ] 327Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ʰ¹âÈÎȾ 2026-04-05 4/200 2026-04-05 20:16 by ÄϺ½~ÍòÀÏʦ
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏ0856 Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ 323 Çóµ÷¼Á +14 Ô¬sy 2026-04-01 14/700 2026-04-05 18:18 by cql1109
[¿¼ÑÐ] 313Çóµ÷¼Á +5 º£ÈÕº£ÈÕ 2026-04-04 5/250 2026-04-05 15:52 by jndximd
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÇóÉúÎïѧѧ˶µ÷¼Á¡ª¡ª364·Ö +7 ÔÆ¶äåÞÍäÖ¸ÄÏ 2026-04-04 7/350 2026-04-04 22:49 by zhyzzh
[¿¼ÑÐ] 278Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ÒÀ¾É£¡ 2026-04-02 4/200 2026-04-04 20:27 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085602 ÕÒµ÷¼Á +4 ÄæÊ±Õë¿ìÀÖ 2026-04-02 4/200 2026-04-04 19:32 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
[¿¼ÑÐ] 266Çóµ÷¼Á +8 ѧԱ97LZgn 2026-04-03 8/400 2026-04-04 09:02 by 20021109
[¿¼ÑÐ] 320µ÷¼Á +4 ũҵ¹¤³ÌÓëÐÅÏ¢¼ 2026-04-03 4/200 2026-04-03 21:40 by lbsjt
[¿¼ÑÐ] 266Çóµ÷¼Á +18 ÑôÑôÍÛÈû 2026-04-01 18/900 2026-04-03 18:38 by zllcz
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +8 akdhjs 2026-04-03 8/400 2026-04-03 18:17 by ´÷άING
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +9 akdhjs 2026-03-31 11/550 2026-04-03 13:32 by akdhjs
[¿¼ÑÐ] »¯Ñ§070300-×Ü·Ö378-Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ŲÒÎ×ÓµÄÅÝÅÝÌÇ 2026-04-02 5/250 2026-04-02 22:20 by ZXlzxl0425
[¿¼ÑÐ] 318Çóµ÷¼Á£¬¼ÆËã²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò +10 Îüß÷Óк¦óÏÃü 2026-04-01 11/550 2026-04-02 16:29 by oooqiao
[¿¼ÑÐ] ũѧ¿¼ÑÐÇóµ÷¼Á +3 dkdkxm 2026-04-01 3/150 2026-04-02 16:04 by wangjagri
[¿¼ÑÐ] ʡ˫һÁ÷ÖØµãÒ»±¾´óѧÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á +4 wwwwffffff 2026-03-31 7/350 2026-04-01 15:23 by wwwwffffff
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á£ºÒ»Ö¾Ô¸£ºÄϾ©´óѧ רҵ£º0705 ×Ü·Ö320 £¬±¾¿Æ985£¬ËÄÁù¼¶Òѹý +3 lfy760306 2026-03-31 3/150 2026-04-01 01:57 by Creta
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û