| 查看: 1058 | 回复: 2 | ||
aioroslove金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
很郁闷不知道TD错在哪 已有1人参与
|
|
很简单的输入文件： #P TD(NStates=1000) RM06L/6-311+G(2df,2p) SCF=(Tight, Direct, MaxCycle=256) 0 1 H H 1 R Variables: R 5.2 在这个键长5.2就出错，比这个小的键长都没问题。出错信息如下： SCF Done: E(RM06L) = -0.906846534525 A.U. after 8 cycles Convg = 0.4280D-08 -V/T = 2.0204 KE= 8.887264120360D-01 PE=-2.089022655327D+00 EE= 1.916848609593D-01 Leave Link 502 at Mon May 26 13:56:26 2014, MaxMem=26214400000 cpu: 2.9 (Enter /usr/local/g09/l801.exe) Range of M.O.s used for correlation: 1 18 NBasis= 18 NAE= 1 NBE= 1 NFC= 0 NFV= 0 NROrb= 18 NOA= 1 NOB= 1 NVA= 17 NVB= 17 **** Fatal Problem: The smallest alpha delta epsilon is 0.67486854D-03 Error termination via Lnk1e in /usr/local/g09/l801.exe 找了好多没找到解决办法，求教啊！！！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
分子动力学 Plumed教程求助
已经有0人回复
-
研究生学术新锐奖｜宁波微纳材料研讨会参会通知
已经有2人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有250人回复
-
申请2027年材料/化学类博士
已经有6人回复
-
求相关合成条件
已经有14人回复
-
2027春季申博自荐
已经有6人回复
-
青基的材料青椒们，可以把硕士联培生送我这里，要研二男生
已经有68人回复
-
申博
已经有2人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 看到一个作汽车货车箱体的原料成分，不知道这个PD、TD是什么的缩写啊？
已经有5人回复
- 【求助】vasp5.2用B3LYP计算
已经有21人回复
|
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_63f1237a0100gr29.html 这是我在新浪博客上看到的，以下是博客内容。 一个最常见的Warning：（以下是摘自CCL，引号内为高斯公司对此warning的回复解释） **** Warning!!: The largest alpha MO coefficient is 0.10268903D+02 **** Warning!!: The smallest alpha delta epsilon is 0.84363472D-01 "Gaussian tests the values of the MO coefficients and orbital energies after each SCF calculation. When you get a warning about the smallest delta epsilon, the warning is referring to the difference between orbital energies. Since some of the equations in post-HF methods include a term in the numerator which has the MO coefficients to some positive integer and a difference in orbital energies in the denominator, the calculations can become numerically unstable if the numerator is too large (e.g. MO coefficients too large) or the denominator is too small (orbital energy difference too small). So, this is a warning that the post-HF results may be affected. However, the criteria for these warnings are fairly strict, so the vast majority of the calculations that have these warning messages do not actually suffer from numerical instabilities. If you have results that don't seem to make sense, and these warnings are present, it would be a good idea to repeat the calculation with a different basis set (these problems tend to be worse for basis sets with many diffuse functions) to verify the results." 总结一下，就是通常没有什么关系。 如果发现结果不合理（是否合理，那得自己根据体系判断）， 可能需要用不含弥散的基组试试看。 |
2楼2017-02-09 13:55:02
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
3楼2017-02-12 22:00:34