24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1942  |  回复: 7

cao2oem

金虫 (著名写手)

[求助] OL拒稿信已有7人参与

投的OL被拒了,两个reviewer的意见是大修,分别给了6,7分,一个直接拒,只给1分。


Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Organic Letters. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Organic Letters.

However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider within 60 days at the latest a revised new manuscript that revises the current work to include such data and analysis (assuming no related data is published in the interim). This revised new manuscript should address the reviewers’ comments and your cover letter should include a point-by-point response to the concerns. Please note that questions and comments from the reviewers should be regarded as representative of those that might be posed by readers of the article. Consequently, these questions and comments should be addressed not only in the response letter but also within the body of the resubmitted manuscript itself.

NOTE: The resubmitted work will have a new submission date and a new manuscript number.

You will see your manuscript files for this submission in your Paragon Plus account in the Author tab (in the list near the bottom) titled:

"Expired Revisions and Manuscripts No Longer Under Consideration."

This link will remain for 60 days. We can extend the due date upon request. If you have not submitted the work by the due date, the manuscript will no longer appear in your Paragon Plus account, however you can still submit it. In your cover letter, include information about the prior submission and a detailed description of the changes made in response to the points raised in the prior evaluation.

这再投还有意义吗
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Supermaster

新虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
相当于据稿后重投,我觉得如果你能好好地按照审稿人的意见仔细修改自己的文章,再重投过去,接受的可能性还是很大的
2楼2014-05-02 10:39:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
如果你认为通过修改可以极大提升论文水准,那么完全可以再投
3楼2014-05-02 17:41:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

615780236

禁虫 (知名作家)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
本帖内容被屏蔽

4楼2014-05-02 19:00:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangjun890

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
当然有意义,除非是终审拒搞,不在受理。
按照修改意见,逐条修改,应该还有希望。
5楼2014-05-02 19:24:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

igg061130172

新虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
他这个说没有重投的意思,之后让完善数据做出回复那都是约定俗成的说法,重投是reject and resubmit,所以还是先按照提的要求该补的补,该改的改,如果有些实在难以满足审稿人要求,干脆改投吧,据我所知,高等合成催化比ol容易中,if也有5.5,还是挺好的。

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
6楼2014-05-02 20:09:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (正式写手)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
本帖仅楼主可见
7楼2014-05-02 21:54:48
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

xj850626

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
这种情况只要你认真按照审稿人和编辑的要求进行修改,希望还是蛮大的。这个编辑已经很仁慈了,一般来说我们组投OL首先两个审稿人一正一负,编辑都是直接拒绝不再送第三个审稿人了。好好修改,希望大于>85%。
有机合成,金属有机,不对称催化
8楼2014-05-02 23:29:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 cao2oem 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见