24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jiazuny168

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 983.7
散金: 42
红花: 1
帖子: 282
在线: 203.6小时
虫号: 3035231
注册: 2014-03-10
性别: GG
专业: 建筑物理

[交流] ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT 一审意见和二审意见的比较？

昨天收到ECM的二审意见了，继续修改哎奔溃啊
各位大神，请问我这个还有必要改不？心都灰了。。。
一审意见：
Thank you for sending the manuscript/revised manuscript, "***" to Energy Conversion and Management for publication.  I apologize for the lengthy period of review. The review is now complete, and unfortunately, it is not completely favorable. Therefore, the paper cannot be published in Energy Conversion and Management as it is presented. I have consolidated the review comments below in the hope that they will be helpful to you in modifying the paper.

Reviewer Comments:
****
I hope these comments will be helpful to you. My sense of the reviewers' comments is that there is a very good basis on which I can recommend that this paper be modified in a responsive manner to the comments above.
If the modification is done carefully and completely, upon re-submission and evaluation, I think you can be confident that the paper will be accepted for publication in Energy Conversion and Management. Thank you again for sending this paper to Energy Conversion and Management for consideration.

二审意见：
Thank you for sending the manuscript/revised manuscript "***“ to Energy Conversion and Management for publication.
I apologize for the lengthy period of review.  The review is now complete, and unfortunately, it is not completely favorable.  Therefore, the paper cannot be published in Energy Conversion and Management as it is presented.  I have consolidated the review comments below in the hope that they will be helpful to you in revising the paper.

Editor: Both reviewers are generally still not satisfied with the level of English language used in the revised manuscript. May I kindly suggest the authors to ask a colleague that is a native English speaker to edit the English language or perhaps may consider the use of professional English editing services.
I hope these comments will be helpful to you.  My sense of the reviewers' comments is that there is an excellent basis on which I can recommend that this paper be revised in accordance with the advice above and re-submitted.  If the revision is done carefully and completely, upon re-submission, I think you can be certain that the paper will be accepted for publication in Energy Conversion and Management without further review.  Thank you again for sending this paper to Energy Conversion and Management for consideration.

回复此楼