| 查看: 4835 | 回复: 28 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
论文小修之后又变成了under review,好焦急的说 已有17人参与
|
|||
|
这是一审时,审稿人的意见, Ref.: Ms. No. EPJP-D-14-00013 A Study on Oscillating Second Kind Boundary Condition for Pennes Equation Considering Thermal Relaxation. The European Physical Journal - Plus Dear Dr. zhu, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. The reviewers' comments can be found at the end of this email or can be accessed by following the provided link. When revising your work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Your revision is due by 01-04-2014. To submit a revision, go to http://epjp.edmgr.com/ and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called 'Submissions Needing Revision'. You will find your submission record there. Yours sincerely Paolo Biscari Associate Editor The European Physical Journal - Plus Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: In their paper, authors study the effects of the thermal relaxation, the blood perfusion and the oscillating of ambient heat flux on the living tissue temperature through a 1D Cattaneo-Vernott (CV) model for Pennes' bioheat transfer equation under oscillating second kind boundary condition. They showed that the tissue temperature oscillates in the same period with the ambient heat flow. Investigating the of blood perfusion on the temperature, they obtained, in a special case, that the mean value of excess temperature will reach a steady-state. They have also discussed the effect of relaxation time τ_{q} on the steady-state temperature. The theme discussed in the manuscript is interesting althought the author have limited themselves in the linear case of CV model. The manuscript can then be published in the EPJ-Plus after the authors gave appropriate answers to the below critics. 1. What is the mean of the abbreviation CV which appears in the abstract (it probably stands for Cattaneo and Vernott)? 2. Second line of page 2, authors must correct the world Penes which probably stands for Pennes. 3. In the second line after Eq (2), it should be b etter to write: τ_{q} ranges from 10⁻¹⁴ to 10⁻⁸ s. 4. May the authors explain why they stat that the CV model of bioheat transfer is very important (see end of page 2)? 5. May the authors accurately explain why the insertion of Eq. (2) into Eq. (1) gives Eq. (3)? 6. I cannot see why after multiplying both sides of Eq. (4) by k, authors have obtained Eq. (10)! Eq. (10) is valid only when k is constant. 7. Θ introduced after Eq. (12) is not defined 3.4日通知小修,16日(周日)晚我将修改稿返回,17日我的稿件又变成了under review,好焦急的说。 修了两次,已经accepted了!从去年12.28日投稿到今年4.15日文章接收,历时3个月零19天,刨除西方人元旦休息,共历时3个月零12天。 [ Last edited by zwp781229 on 2014-4-18 at 15:51 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生
已经有6人回复
课题组招2027级博士 上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造方向
已经有6人回复
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有14人回复
求合成方法
已经有8人回复
师弟论文见刊大半年才想起来申请专利,还能抢救一下吗?
已经有4人回复
有机合成以后会不会被AI改变?做科研的虫友怎么看
已经有8人回复
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复
flowerrainhm
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 121 (高中生)
- 金币: 1306.7
- 散金: 225
- 红花: 18
- 帖子: 823
- 在线: 87.8小时
- 虫号: 3062999
- 注册: 2014-03-17
- 专业: 物理海洋学
16楼2014-03-21 16:35:19
yijianmeixyt
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
一剪梅
- 应助: 158 (高中生)
- 金币: 16506.5
- 散金: 59
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 1880
- 在线: 304.6小时
- 虫号: 1161506
- 注册: 2010-12-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 机构学与机器人

2楼2014-03-20 11:42:34
3楼2014-03-20 11:44:59
幼麟儿
木虫 (著名写手)
硕士
- 应助: 33 (小学生)
- 金币: 1598.8
- 散金: 774
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 1023
- 在线: 268.1小时
- 虫号: 2082413
- 注册: 2012-10-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 通信理论与系统

4楼2014-03-20 14:05:48










回复此楼