24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 522  |  回复: 3
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

denglinlyn

金虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 请教各位前辈已有2人参与

论文审稿意见中有如下一条:
The main point, which is in the same time the “cover” of the paper is the manner of presentation of the results of the sorption. This is impossible to compare the amount of sorbed Cr(VI) and P when the results are presented in [mg/g]. Comparing the results of the sorption experiments is possible only when presented in [mmol/kg]. Therefore, a discussion about sorption mechanism of chromate and phosphate presented in the work may be completely wrong. From a practical point of view it makes more sense to have the results presented in [mg/g] or [mg/L] but certainly not from the point of view of sorption mechanism.
我是做吸附方向的,文章里面都是用吸附量,也就是mg/g来表示吸附剂对污染物的去处效果。文章的审稿意见回来了,请问各位前辈,审稿人是要求我把所有的图里面的mg/g都换算成mmol/Kg吗?小弟看了好多吸附方向的外文文章,大部分都是以mg/g来表述吸附剂对污染物的去除效果。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ws861227

铁虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
审稿人让你怎么干你就怎么干,别对着干,这只是改个单位,又不是原则性问题,满足审稿人~~~
4楼2014-03-10 15:56:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 4 个回答

jimmylee0036

新虫 (小有名气)

不懂,先祝福你!

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2014-03-10 08:44:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nowitzki_ci

专家顾问 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
那就按照审稿人说的做 最大程度满足审稿人的要求

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2014-03-10 09:01:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见