24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1462  |  回复: 4
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

virgilee

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 关于《REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS》的decision letter 已有3人参与

本人第一次投sci,没有经验。请教大家几个问题。
投稿大改50天收到decision letter。编辑原话如下:
From the reviews, I conclude that a better introduction that describes the present state-of-art is needed. Please address both reviews and submit a revised manuscript. Please explain the changes in such-a-way that we can easily relate them to the comments of the reviewers. The revised manuscript will be peer reviewed again.
想请教大家最后一句是什么意思?修改后还要重新再审还是给原来的审稿人审呢?
另外,是审稿人的评价:
审稿人1
Recommendation: Publish after revision
Technically sound: Y
New ideas: Y
Just a variation of known device or technique: N
Appropriate journal: Y
Proper context with related work: Y
Clear explanation: N
Adequate references: N
Suitable title: Y
Adequate abstract: Y
Significant numerical quantities: Y
Clear figures with captions: N
Excessive text or figures: N
English satisfactory: N
Regular Article vs Note: Regular Article
此人就提出了3个问题不算大改。
审稿人2
Recommendation: Publish after revision
Technically sound: Y
New ideas: Y
Just a variation of known device or technique: N
Appropriate journal: Y
Proper context with related work: Y
Clear explanation: Y
Adequate references: Y
Suitable title: N
Adequate abstract: N
Significant numerical quantities: Y
Clear figures with captions: Y
Excessive text or figures: N
English satisfactory: Y
Regular Article vs Note: Regular Article
此人说我的研究很有趣,建议修改题目(还帮我想了个题目)和摘要以便有更普遍的应用价值。
大家看看有多大的可能录用?谢谢!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

782826490

新虫 (初入文坛)

我也和楼主情况相似,收到两个Publish after revision,请问你文章最后什么进度啊
路是走出来的
5楼2017-03-07 11:28:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 virgilee 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见