24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

幼麟儿

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 33 (小学生)
金币: 1598.8
帖子: 1023
在线: 268小时
虫号: 2082413

[交流] Optical Engineering返回后的修改意见，求大家指教这是大修还是小修，并如何回答？

Dear xxx,

Your paper entitled "xxxx" has been reviewed and found to be suitable for publication in Optical Engineering. However, the reviewer comments on the manuscript indicate that some revision is needed before the paper can be accepted.

The reviewer comments are included below. I have reviewed these comments and I agree that a revision and re-review would be required for us to be able to publish your paper.

The revised manuscript should be submitted within one month of the date of this letter. I will then have the paper re-reviewed and will let you know the outcome. If you need more than one month to complete your revision, please contact the editorial office for an extension.

Reviewer Comments:

Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
Appropriateness for OE: Good
Quality of writing: Poor
Clarity: Satisfactory
Conciseness: Good
References to literature: Satisfactory
Relevance of figures: Satisfactory
Originality: Satisfactory
Significance of results: Satisfactory
Technical accuracy of results: No Comment
Rigor: No Comment
Detail level of procedures: Good
Substantiation of conclusions: Satisfactory

Reviewer #1 (Reviewer Comments Required):

Unfortunately, the English is still sub-standard and the paper cannot be publshed as is.

回复此楼