²é¿´: 3391  |  »Ø¸´: 71

John_5V5

гæ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)


¡ï
qtech_he(½ð±Ò+1): лл²ÎÓë
ÐÂÄêÐÂÆøÏó£¬×£¸£Â¥Ö÷£¬ÐÂÄê¿ìÀÖ£¡
52Â¥2014-02-02 11:52:04
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

snowforest9159

Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)


¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
àÅ£¬Ö§³ÖÉêËߣ¬¼´±ã±»¾ÜÔÙÒªÇå³þÔ­Òò£¬Ï£ÍûÂ¥Ö÷³É¹¦£¬Ò²Îª×Ô¼ºÒ»Éó30Ì죬¶þÉóÒѾ­2¸ö¶àÔµÄÎÄÕÂÆí¸£¡£
53Â¥2014-02-02 12:02:56
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

pjstang

ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)


¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
×£¸£Å¶¡«¡«×£¸£Å¶¡«¡«ºÇºÇ¡«¡«
55Â¥2014-02-03 01:31:10
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

Luckyzhou6

½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)


¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Ôõô»áÀÖ¹Û°¡£¡²»¹ýÓÐÕæ²ÅʵѧµÄÔõô¶¼»á·¢¹â
56Â¥2014-02-03 03:28:23
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

chg

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
µ¥ÔªÂ¥Ö÷µÄÉêËßÓÐÓ㬲»¹ý¸Ð¾õÏ£Íû²»´ó
57Â¥2014-02-03 10:27:06
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

1021711703

ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)


¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
ÕýÔÚѧϰµ±ÖУ¬ÔÝʱÎÞ·¨ÌáÒâ¼ûŶ¡«

[ ·¢×ÔÊÖ»ú°æ http://muchong.com/3g ]
58Â¥2014-02-03 11:30:58
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

qtech_he

½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


ÒýÓûØÌû:
52Â¥: Originally posted by John_5V5 at 2014-02-02 11:52:04
ÐÂÄêÐÂÆøÏó£¬×£¸£Â¥Ö÷£¬ÐÂÄê¿ìÀÖ£¡

ÉêËßÐÅÏ£Íû±È½ÏС¡£
Dear Professor M. Jefferson,

Thanks for your reading this letter firstly.

I am the corresponding author of the paper ¡°**¡± , which was rejected this day. Thank you for your kind attention to consider our work in ##. I am terribly sorry for such a terrible conclusion made by the reviewer.

I know the reviewer 1 have done much work in reviewing my paper, but I think there must be some misunderstanding in the review process. So, I should give a rebuttal against the comments of the reviewer one. I have not been persuaded and I consider the comments are unreasonable and unfair for our work. I don¡¯t know why the reviewer gave such nasty comments and made a so terrible conclusion about our future work. I doubt whether he has read our manuscript carefully and completely or not.

Thus, our team is writing this letter to make some explanation about the comments of reviewer 1. The responses are listed as follows.
59Â¥2014-02-04 09:47:28
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

qtech_he

½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


ÒýÓûØÌû:
53Â¥: Originally posted by snowforest9159 at 2014-02-02 12:02:56
àÅ£¬Ö§³ÖÉêËߣ¬¼´±ã±»¾ÜÔÙÒªÇå³þÔ­Òò£¬Ï£ÍûÂ¥Ö÷³É¹¦£¬Ò²Îª×Ô¼ºÒ»Éó30Ì죬¶þÉóÒѾ­2¸ö¶àÔµÄÎÄÕÂÆí¸£¡£

°ÜËßÁË
60Â¥2014-02-04 09:48:28
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

qtech_he

½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


ÒýÓûØÌû:
10Â¥: Originally posted by ´÷¸Ö¿øµÄÖíÍ· at 2014-02-02 10:12:14
×£¸£Â¥Ö÷ÎÄÕÂÔçÈÕ½ÓÊÕ

°ÜËßÁË
61Â¥2014-02-04 09:48:44
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

qtech_he

½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


ÒýÓûØÌû:
12Â¥: Originally posted by ½ª²©1988 at 2014-02-02 10:13:37
Éê±ç¿ÉÒÔÂð Òª²»»»¸öÔÓÖ¾ÊÔÊÔ

»»¸öÔÓ־̫Âé·³£¬²»¹ý»¹ÊǰÜËßÁË£¡
62Â¥2014-02-04 09:49:13
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

qtech_he

½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


ÒýÓûØÌû:
39Â¥: Originally posted by ËÎȫΰ at 2014-02-02 10:50:15
×£¸£Äã:
¿ìÂí¼Ó±ÞËÍ×£¸££¬Âíµ½³É¹¦Õ¹ºèͼ£¬ÍòÂí±¼ÌÚ¸°Ç°³Ì£¬Ò»Âíµ±ÏÈÊÂÒµÍú£¬²ßÂíÑï±Þ±¼Ð¡¿µ£¬»¶ÌìϲµØÓ­ÂíÄ꣬ÂíÄêµ½£¬Ô¸Äã·¢ÑïÁúÂí¾«Éñ£¬ÓÂÍùֱǰ£¬´´ÔìÐÒ¸£Éú»î£¬ÂíÄ꼪Ï飡
...

лл°¡£¡
63Â¥2014-02-04 09:49:33
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

qtech_he

½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


ÒýÓûØÌû:
42Â¥: Originally posted by zhenhao886 at 2014-02-02 10:57:17
¼ÓÓÍ£¬ºÃÎÄÕ²»ÓÃÅÂ

µÈ¼¸ÌìÖ®ºóÔÙ»»¸öÕ˺ÅͶ¹ýÈ¥°É£¡
64Â¥2014-02-04 09:49:59
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

jiemila

Í­³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
ÕâÖÖÇé¿öºÜ³£¼û£¬ÏàÐÅÿ¸ö×ö¿ÆÑеͼÓöµ½¹ý£¬Æ½³£ÐÄ£¡

[ ·¢×ÔÊÖ»ú°æ http://muchong.com/3g ]
65Â¥2014-02-04 10:22:26
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

John_5V5

гæ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)


ÒýÓûØÌû:
59Â¥: Originally posted by qtech_he at 2014-02-04 09:47:28
ÉêËßÐÅÏ£Íû±È½ÏС¡£
Dear Professor M. Jefferson,

Thanks for your reading this letter firstly.

I am the corresponding author of the paper ¡°**¡± , which was rejected this day. Thank you for you ...

µÚÎåÐкöà´íÎó¡­¡­
66Â¥2014-02-04 13:07:58
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

À´¸ö¿É°®¶à

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)


¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Ö§³ÖÉêÊö£¬ÎÒµÄһƪpaper¾ÍÊÇÉêÊöºó±à¼­ÓÖ¸øÁË»ú»áËÍÉó£¬×îºó¾È»îÁË

[ ·¢×ÔÊÖ»ú°æ http://muchong.com/3g ]
67Â¥2014-02-04 14:12:23
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

zhuwy16

ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)


×£¸£Â¥Ö÷

[ ·¢×ÔСľ³æ¿Í»§¶Ë ]
68Â¥2014-02-04 14:21:52
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

alidong

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Â¥Ö÷ÄãºÃ£¡ÎÒµÄÂÛÎÄÒ²ÊÇ2¸öÐ޸ģ¬Ò»¸öû˵¾Ü²»¾Ü£¬µ«ÊDZ༭ֱ½Ó¸ø¾Ü¸åÁË¡£ËùÒÔ±¾ÈËÒ²ÏëÉê±ç¡£µ«ÊDz»ÖªµÀÔõôȥÉê±ç£¬³ÌÐòÊÇʲôÑùµÄ£¿Çë½Ì£¬¿É·ñ½«Éê±çÐÅÄ£°å·¢¸øÎÒÒ»·Ý£¬Íû°ïÖú£¬Íò·Ö¸Ðл£¡£¡£¡
70Â¥2014-04-21 09:26:25
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

qtech_he

½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


ÒýÓûØÌû:
70Â¥: Originally posted by alidong at 2014-04-21 09:26:25
Â¥Ö÷ÄãºÃ£¡ÎÒµÄÂÛÎÄÒ²ÊÇ2¸öÐ޸ģ¬Ò»¸öû˵¾Ü²»¾Ü£¬µ«ÊDZ༭ֱ½Ó¸ø¾Ü¸åÁË¡£ËùÒÔ±¾ÈËÒ²ÏëÉê±ç¡£µ«ÊDz»ÖªµÀÔõôȥÉê±ç£¬³ÌÐòÊÇʲôÑùµÄ£¿Çë½Ì£¬¿É·ñ½«Éê±çÐÅÄ£°å·¢¸øÎÒÒ»·Ý£¬Íû°ïÖú£¬Íò·Ö¸Ðл£¡£¡£¡

Dear Professor M. Jefferson,

Thanks for your reading this letter firstly.

I am the corresponding author of the paper ¡°**¡± , which was rejected this day. Thank you for your kind attention to consider our work in ##. I am terribly sorry for such a terrible conclusion made by the reviewer.

I know the reviewer 1 have done much work in reviewing my paper, but I think there must be some misunderstanding in the review process. So, I should give a rebuttal against the comments of the reviewer one. I have not been persuaded and I consider the comments are unreasonable and unfair for our work. I don¡¯t know why the reviewer gave such nasty comments and made a so terrible conclusion about our future work. I doubt whether he has read our manuscript carefully and completely or not.

Thus, our team is writing this letter to make some explanation about the comments of reviewer 1. The responses are listed as follows.
71Â¥2014-04-23 12:16:48
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

alidong

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)


¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
ÒýÓûØÌû:
71Â¥: Originally posted by qtech_he at 2014-04-23 12:16:48
Dear Professor M. Jefferson,

Thanks for your reading this letter firstly.

I am the corresponding author of the paper ¡°**¡± , which was rejected this day. Thank you for your kind attention to  ...

·Ç³£¸Ðл£¡Ô¸Äã¿ÆÑÐ˳Àû£¡£¡£¡
72Â¥2014-04-24 11:41:14
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
¼òµ¥»Ø¸´
2014-02-02 11:43   »Ø¸´  
henry83554Â¥
2014-02-02 14:04   »Ø¸´  
tkjia69Â¥
2014-02-04 17:24   »Ø¸´  
×£¸££¡ [ ·¢×ÔÊÖ»ú°æ http://muchong.com/3g ]
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ qtech_he µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 279·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211 +9 chaojifeixia 2026-03-19 10/500 2026-03-20 12:29 by lature00
[¿¼ÑÐ] 274Çóµ÷¼Á +8 S.H1 2026-03-18 8/400 2026-03-20 11:53 by ѧԱ8dgXkO
[¿¼ÑÐ] 286·ÖÈ˹¤ÖÇÄÜרҵÇëÇóµ÷¼ÁÔ¸Òâ¿ç¿¼£¡ +3 lemonzzn 2026-03-17 4/200 2026-03-20 11:04 by lemonzzn
[¿¼ÑÐ] 304Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ÂüÊâ2266 2026-03-18 5/250 2026-03-20 09:00 by ZHANG0tao
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼ÁÕÐÈË£¡£¡£¡ +3 ɽº£Ììá° 2026-03-17 4/200 2026-03-19 21:34 by ÔõôÊÍ»³
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á +5 pupcoco 2026-03-17 8/400 2026-03-19 13:58 by houyaoxu
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖпƼ¼´óѧ£¬080502£¬354·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +4 ÊØºòϦÑôCF 2026-03-18 4/200 2026-03-18 22:16 by li123456789.
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏרҵÇóµ÷¼Á +5 hanamiko 2026-03-18 5/250 2026-03-18 20:19 by ÐÇ¿ÕÐÇÔÂ
[¿¼ÑÐ] 280Çóµ÷¼Á +6 ¹¾ààÏþÏþ 2026-03-18 7/350 2026-03-18 11:25 by Î޼ʵIJÝÔ­
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á +3 ÄÝÄÝninicgb 2026-03-17 3/150 2026-03-18 10:29 by macy2011
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÉúÎïѧ071000 329·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +3 ÎÒ°®ÉúÎïÉúÎﰮΠ2026-03-17 3/150 2026-03-18 10:12 by macy2011
[¿¼²©] 26²©Ê¿ÉêÇë +3 1042136743 2026-03-17 3/150 2026-03-17 23:30 by ÇáËɲ»ÉÙËæ
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¿¼ÑÐÇóµ÷¼Á +3 éÙËÌ. 2026-03-17 4/200 2026-03-17 21:43 by ÓÐÖ»ÀêÅ«
[¿¼ÑÐ] 326Çóµ÷¼Á +5 Éϰ¶µÄСÆÏ 2026-03-15 6/300 2026-03-17 17:26 by ruiyingmiao
[¿¼ÑÐ] 332Çóµ÷¼Á +6 Zz°æ 2026-03-13 6/300 2026-03-17 17:03 by ruiyingmiao
[¿¼ÑÐ] 283Çóµ÷¼Á +3 Ìý·ç¾ÍÊÇÓꣻ 2026-03-16 3/150 2026-03-17 07:41 by ÈÈÇéɳĮ
[¿¼ÑÐ] »úеר˶325£¬Ñ°ÕÒµ÷¼ÁԺУ +3 y9999 2026-03-15 5/250 2026-03-16 19:58 by y9999
[¿¼ÑÐ] 326Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ŵ±´¶û»¯Ñ§½±êéê 2026-03-15 7/350 2026-03-16 17:11 by ŵ±´¶û»¯Ñ§½±êéê
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211 0703·½Ïò310·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +3 ŬÁ¦·Ü¶·112 2026-03-15 3/150 2026-03-16 16:44 by houyaoxu
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÕÐÊÕ0805£¨²ÄÁÏ£©µ÷¼Á +3 18595523086 2026-03-13 3/150 2026-03-14 00:33 by 123%¡¢
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û