24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4546)
>文献求助 (475)
>导师招生 (389)
>虫友互识 (350)
>考博 (167)
>论文投稿 (159)
>博后之家 (139)
>休闲灌水 (131)
>硕博家园 (116)
>考研 (96)
>公派出国 (92)
>基金申请 (79)
>论文道贺祈福 (71)
>教师之家 (71)
>找工作 (54)
>招聘信息布告栏 (45)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

smallfolk

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 92 (初中生)
金币: 657.2
帖子: 698
在线: 597.7小时
虫号: 442827

[交流] chem comm投稿11天后，直接被编辑拒掉了。只好年后再战了。

Thank you for your submission to ChemComm, which I have read with interest. I regret to inform you however that this manuscript will not be considered further as a submission to the journal. All manuscripts submitted to ChemComm are initially evaluated by the Editors to ensure they meet the essential criteria for publication in the journal. I’m sorry to say that on this occasion your article will undergo no further processing because it is not of sufficient urgency and impact to appeal to our wide readership.

Papers published in ChemComm should report preliminary accounts of original and significant research that will appeal to a wide general readership or be of great interest to the specialist. The rejection rate for papers submitted to ChemComm is ~70%. Further information regarding our policy on the initial assessment of submissions can be found on our website at http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/Jo ... ssessment/index.asp
对照了一下，
A manuscript may be returned to the author(s) without external review if, in the opinion of the Editor, the manuscript falls into one or more of the following categories:

•the manuscript clearly falls outside the scope of the journal;
•the work is of poor scientific quality such that it is clearly not suitable for publication in a top-tier scientific journal;
•the manuscript is of insufficient general interest for the journal and would be better suited to a more specialised journal;
•the novelty of the work falls below that required for the journal;
•the manuscript represents undue fragmentation of the research into multiple papers;
•the manuscript contains redundant information or significant amounts of material that has already been published elsewhere or is under consideration by another journal;
•the quality of the English in the manuscript is so poor as to render the science presented unclear;
•the manuscript has already been reviewed and rejected by a different RSC journal, and the author(s) have made little or no attempt to address the advice of the Editor and/or referees already given;
•the conclusions drawn by the manuscript are well known or have been previously published.

貌似是编辑觉得应该投更专业的期刊。
不过我有个疑问，会不会因为不好意思直说写的太烂，而委婉地以文中所说的原因拒掉啊？
如之奈何？换个专业期刊试试？求意见！

回复此楼