| 查看: 3850 | 回复: 3 | |||||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||||||
[交流]
博后的出路： 给将要国外博后的人的一点思考 已有3人参与
|
|||||||
|
闲暇时看到澳洲ABC上一篇谈论澳大利亚研究人员流失的文章，感觉写得超级符合当下澳大利亚科研界年轻人苦苦挣扎的现状。特分享给大家。 当然这篇文章只是谈到澳大利亚的情况。不过个人猜想欧美其它国家应该情况类似。 希望这篇文章能够起到抛砖引玉的效果，能够给已经在国外博后或将要博后的各位对自己职业生涯的一点点思考，尽早明确自己博后的目标与出路。 文章出处： http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2014/01/16/3926579.htm。（不知道的国内的能不能访问这个地址， 下面是我复制的文章内容）。 Hanging up their labcoats: Australia's new brain drain Faced with limited job opportunities, disenchanted young researchers are giving up on careers in science, writes Tim Nielsen. Disenchanted young researchers are reluctantly giving up on careers in science altogether and are being lost permanently to other professions (Source: jeangill/iStockphoto) January is an exciting month for those medical researchers fortunate enough to have received grant funding for new projects in 2014. But as funding success rates continue to fall, a career on the grant treadmill is looking decidedly unattractive to a growing number of younger scientists. Last year, Professor Brendan Crabb of The Association of Australian Medical Research Institutes warned that "falling success rates on medical research grants will eventually reach breaking point and start seriously discouraging young researchers from sticking with their careers". As a recent PhD graduate, it saddens me to inform Professor Crabb that this has been happening for some time now. In fact, I would go so far as to say that Australian science now needs to recognise and address two distinct "brain-drain" phenomena: the original form whereby newly-minted scientists feel compelled to leave the country temporarily in order to kick-start their careers overseas; and a newer, more pernicious beast in which disenchanted young researchers are reluctantly giving up on careers in science altogether and are being lost permanently to other professions right here in Australia. In my 10 years at the bench, I saw countless young PhDs leaving the lab shortly after graduating to retrain for careers in high-school teaching, engineering, medicine, sales, and the law. Indeed, I left after one year of post-doctoral work to pursue a career in business. Of those who do remain in science, a large number still feel compelled to have a "plan B" just in case. I know of no other profession with such a high attrition rate. Exodus from the lab To anyone outside science, it must be incomprehensible that these educated, intelligent and ambitious individuals are becoming so despondent that they are willing to quit a scientific career after some eight years of study, go right back to square one and spend a further four years training in something else. For me, and for those with whom I discussed the topic endlessly before leaving the lab, the reasons for this exodus were clear: poor employment conditions and a lack of career prospects. As young scientists, we simply did not know whether there would be an opportunity for us to carve out a meaningful career in a cut-throat industry where short-term employment was the norm and where failure to secure grant funding for even a single year can result in unemployment and career oblivion. First, there is the steady stream of short term contracts that are the hallmark of a career in research. At first, this is merely annoying. But by the time a researcher reaches their thirties, with the additional responsibilities of mortgage and family, it is untenable. They can no longer wait until November of each year to find out whether or not they will have a job in January of the next. And since they've been employed on contracts or short-term fellowships for their entire career, there is no severance pay or re-deployment for the unemployed researcher, even after 20 years of dedicated service to one employer. Compare this to your local member of parliament or even the average Holden worker, who has been given three years' notice and is walking away with several hundred thousand dollars. The redundant scientist walks away with nothing. A risky career In many industries, the trade-off for insecure contract work is higher remuneration. While it's true that salaries for scientists in Australia are higher than in other developed nations, they are low compared to other professions requiring a similar degree of training, such as medicine, veterinary science, dentistry and law. At the mid-career point, a graduate in one of these other professions may be earning two or three times that of the research scientist. Still, for scientists, it's rarely about the money. Most young scientists are not fussed by the modest salaries and are asking for little more than the opportunity to pursue their research interests without the lingering fear of having the rug pulled out from under them at any moment. This is an extremely insecure and risky career path for a single person, let alone someone with a family. The net effect is not only chronic personal stress for the individual scientist but also a severe demoralisation of the workplace in general. It is not pleasant to sit with your highly capable colleagues every November and try to figure out who will be next to go. It's already a bad situation, and the problem for younger researchers is that it continues to deteriorate. Government expenditure on science and research as a proportion of GDP has fallen by more than a quarter since 1993. Incredibly, while more than 55 per cent of applications to the National Health and Medical Research Council (the largest government funding scheme) were deemed by peer reviewers to be worthy of funding in 2013, a record low 19 per cent actually got up. This translates not only to an enormous amount of wasted effort on the part of the applicants, and not only to many projects of great public health benefit being shelved. It also means that the careers of some of the most brilliant young individuals in the country are being cut off at the knees. Incalculable cost Faced with a thankless 40-year battle for career survival, and little material reward or public recognition, it is not difficult to understand why so many young scientists are hanging up their labcoats and taking their extraordinary intellects and years of training elsewhere. In other words, Professor Crabb's "breaking point" has long since passed. This new type of brain drain needs to be addressed urgently, not only for the sake of the scientists themselves, but for the country as a whole. Even on basic economic measures, the status quo makes no sense at all. It costs the taxpayer a fortune to train a world-class scientist, and the long-term opportunity cost of losing one is incalculable. Consider that for every government dollar invested in medical research, over two dollars is returned in the forms of disease prevention, improved healthcare and technological innovation. Australian scientists are some truly remarkable individuals. Their tireless work pushes back the frontiers of knowledge daily to eradicate disease and eliminate human suffering worldwide. Every time one quits to become an accountant, we potentially lose a cure for AIDS or cancer. About the author  r Tim Nielsen received a PhD in biochemistry from the University of Adelaide in 2009 and performed postdoctoral work at the Women's and Children's hospital in Adelaide before reluctantly leaving research to start two businesses in the importing industry. |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 博后申请-huashuhuai | 科研 | posdoc | post doc |
» 猜你喜欢
290调剂生物0860
已经有5人回复
-
359求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
求调剂，985材料与化工348分
已经有5人回复
-
211本科材料化工求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
材料考研调剂
已经有24人回复
-
366求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
求调剂，一志愿大连理工大学354分
已经有5人回复
-
308求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
266求调剂，一志愿哈工程电子信息，本科获多项国奖和省奖
已经有7人回复
-
求调剂
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 关于是否要出国做博后？
已经有7人回复
- 国外博士后的出路
已经有9人回复
- 出国博后语言要求及年限
已经有11人回复
- 机械读博出路在哪？技术管理or理论研究？
已经有5人回复
- 急问：国外博后回国后进央企能解决编制吗
已经有25人回复
- 国外博士毕业后，是去企业好，还是去博后好？
已经有5人回复
- 博士刚毕业，想去美国做博后，这样的条件是否很难？
已经有18人回复
- 在职博后有没有搞头呢？
已经有17人回复
- 【讨论】出国做博后的目的是什么？
已经有23人回复
zsjriver
木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 10 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2624.8
- 散金: 1138
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 5450
- 在线: 526.9小时
- 虫号: 1829145
- 注册: 2012-05-22
- 专业: 运筹与管理
4楼2014-01-27 10:23:58
robiwang
木虫 (著名写手)
飘在天边的那朵云
- 海博EPI : 1
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.153
- 金币: 1598.7
- 散金: 71
- 红花: 90
- 帖子: 1819
- 在线: 958.2小时
- 虫号: 937124
- 注册: 2010-01-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 固体力学
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
文章老生常谈，并无新意，之前看到过很多比这分析得深刻透彻的评论，比如经济学人的那篇著名社论http://www.economist.com/node/17723223 不过还是看到了一个精彩的评论 So true. I recently moved away from the bench after years of thinking I wasn't qualified for anything else... Scientists have a heap of marketable skills, they just don't know it! 科学界无法创造得到市场认可的价值，自然会被遗弃，这种效应在某些学科上可能会被放大数倍。就像美国70年代有大批的物理学家失业，但最终基本也都涌入了华尔街，因为数学功底好。所以如果有本事，可以创造市场认可的价值，干什么不可以。而像某些技术，属于概念股，国家长期投入看不到回报，肯定会有所反思。 [ Last edited by robiwang on 2014-1-17 at 20:36 ] |
2楼2014-01-18 03:29:48
qqweare_00
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 345.1
- 散金: 20
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 188
- 在线: 56.4小时
- 虫号: 1934245
- 注册: 2012-08-11
- 专业: 细胞、亚细胞结构与功能
3楼2014-01-18 21:59:00
20