| 查看: 974 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
huyugcxy银虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
How do you think the change policy of one child
|
||
| One child policy in China which had been carried out for 34 years will be changed soon. This policy, from my point of view, which was contributed to China's population had been led a great disasterous results to our nation. Why did I get this conclusion? If you observe the society carefully, you will find so much faults of this policy which are threating our lives. For example, China are entering into graying society and many social problems are emerging. How does the old couples or singler spend their rest lives wtihout their child's company because their children work far away ? Espically those old copules who lost their only one child would suffer the miserable lives. Government promised that they would resopnsible for the old copules who had only one child about 30 years ago. However, The promise had been changed from responsible to assistace 20 years ago. As time go on, the promise changed a second time. The old couples should not rely on government but themslves. So the old parents who had only one child or who lost only one child are abandoned by government in the end. I guess that they may be live better if they have more than one child. It is undeniable that the policy played a great part in Chia's population at that period. But the present situation in not the same as before and the policy should be changed with the step of society. This my point of one child policy, how do you think it ? |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
0703化学求调剂
已经有20人回复
-
一志愿中科大070300化学，314分求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
288求调剂，一志愿华南理工大学071005
已经有14人回复
-
070300化学279求调剂
已经有18人回复
-
086003调剂求助
已经有12人回复
-
调剂 化学 307
已经有5人回复
-
一志愿085502，267分求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
材料调剂
已经有8人回复
-
复试调剂，一志愿郑州大学材料与化工289分
已经有22人回复
-
材料工程322
已经有19人回复
★ ★
curton: 金币+2, This problem should not be ingorned an more. 2014-01-30 17:10:37
curton: 金币+2, This problem should not be ingorned an more. 2014-01-30 17:10:37
|
one child is better to those poor families,but i think the government was unrelible。it was always change the policies too fast。i think the policy should be based on citizen's happiness …… [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ] |
2楼2014-01-03 00:15:12
otten0
金虫 (小有名气)
- ESEPI: 1
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3507.3
- 散金: 20
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 297
- 在线: 409.3小时
- 虫号: 2330344
- 注册: 2013-03-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 多相流热物理学
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Lopemann: 金币+5, Thanks, I'm looking positive to this country as well! 2014-01-03 15:09:51
Lopemann: 回帖置顶 2014-01-03 15:09:55
Lopemann: 金币+5, Thanks, I'm looking positive to this country as well! 2014-01-03 15:09:51
Lopemann: 回帖置顶 2014-01-03 15:09:55
|
that ia a question, but you should have a whole version about this one-child policy. weighing something is considering the pros and cons, the benifits and harm compeihensively things bring about. one-child policy is what puts a limit on the birth, is a key strategy to ensure us the present people a relative harmony socity atmosphere of relative small gap of wealth, prices-pickup relative slow and without a series of other socal poblems or not relative serious. what if the one-child policy wasnot conducted? there is no consideration on external pressures here. the other thing is this policy is advancing with the times, many places have improved this policy accoding to local conditions. so be positive about our ocuntry! |
3楼2014-01-03 12:30:11
huyugcxy
银虫 (小有名气)
- ESEPI: 1
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1148.5
- 帖子: 109
- 在线: 45.5小时
- 虫号: 2004381
- 注册: 2012-09-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 岩土与基础工程
4楼2014-01-03 15:38:27
