24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1169  |  回复: 12
【奖励】 本帖被评价1次,作者瘦竹云淡风轻增加金币 0.25
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ian_zhangty

木虫 (著名写手)


[资源] 【分享】气候变化:真实还是谎言【已搜索无重复】

今天早上一个外国的朋友发给我了一份东西,是美国参议院对一些反对气候变化的研究所做的整理和总结。我觉得可以使我们得到新的看待问题的方法,对我们的研究有所帮助。

http://epw.senate.gov/public/ind ... d-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb

原文如下:

U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007  

Senate Report Debunks "Consensus"

Complete U.S. Senate Report Now Available: (LINK)  
Complete Report w/out Intro: (LINK)

Update: Former Vice President Al Gore responds to Senate report within hours of release. (LINK)
INTRODUCTION:      

Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called "consensus" on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore.   

  
The new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s office of the GOP Ranking Member details the views of the scientists, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007.  

  

Even some in the establishment media now appear to be taking notice of the growing number of skeptical scientists. In October, the Washington Post Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate skeptics "appear to be expanding rather than shrinking." Many scientists from around the world have dubbed 2007 as the year man-made global warming fears “bite the dust.” (LINK)  In addition, many scientists who are also progressive environmentalists believe climate fear promotion has "co-opted" the green movement. (LINK)  

  
This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation.  It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news outlets, and websites in 2007. This new “consensus busters” report is poised to redefine the debate.

  
Many of the scientists featured in this report consistently stated that numerous colleagues shared their views, but they will not speak out publicly for fear of retribution. Atmospheric scientist Dr. Nathan Paldor, Professor of Dynamical Meteorology and Physical Oceanography at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, author of almost 70 peer-reviewed studies, explains how many of his fellow scientists have been intimidated.

  

“Many of my colleagues with whom I spoke share these views and report on their inability to publish their skepticism in the scientific or public media,” Paldor wrote.  [Note: See also July 2007 Senate report detailing how skeptical scientists have faced threats and intimidation - LINK ]   

  

Scientists from Around the World Dissent   

  

This new report details how teams of international scientists are dissenting from the UN IPCC’s view of climate science. In such nations as Germany, Brazil, the Netherlands, Russia, New Zealand and France, nations, scientists banded together in 2007 to oppose climate alarmism. In addition, over 100 prominent international scientists sent an open letter in December 2007 to the UN stating attempts to control climate were “futile.” (LINK)

  

Paleoclimatologist Dr. Tim Patterson, professor in the department of Earth Sciences at Carleton University in Ottawa, recently converted from a believer in man-made climate change to a skeptic. Patterson noted that the notion of a “consensus” of scientists aligned with the UN IPCC or former Vice President Al Gore is false. “I was at the Geological Society of America meeting in Philadelphia in the fall and I would say that people with my opinion were probably in the majority.”

  
This new committee report, a first of its kind, comes after the UN IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri implied that there were only “about a dozen" skeptical scientists left in the world. (LINK) Former Vice President Gore has claimed that scientists skeptical of climate change are akin to “flat Earth society members” and similar in number to those who “believe the moon landing was actually staged in a movie lot in Arizona.” (LINK) & (LINK)   

  
The distinguished scientists featured in this new report are experts in diverse fields, including: climatology; geology; biology; glaciology; biogeography; meteorology; oceanography; economics; chemistry; mathematics; environmental sciences; engineering; physics and paleoclimatology. Some of those profiled have won Nobel Prizes for their outstanding contribution to their field of expertise and many shared a portion of the UN IPCC Nobel Peace Prize with Vice President Gore.

  

Additionally, these scientists hail from prestigious institutions worldwide, including: Harvard University; NASA; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR); Massachusetts Institute of Technology; the UN IPCC;  the Danish National Space Center; U.S. Department of Energy; Princeton University; the Environmental Protection Agency; University of Pennsylvania; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; the International Arctic Research Centre; the Pasteur Institute in Paris; the Belgian Weather Institute; Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute; the University of Helsinki; the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S., France, and Russia; the University of Pretoria; University of Notre Dame; Stockholm University; University of Melbourne; Columbia University; the World Federation of Scientists; and the University of London.

  
The voices of many of these hundreds of scientists serve as a direct challenge to the often media-hyped “consensus” that the debate is “settled.”

  

A May 2007 Senate report detailed scientists who had recently converted from believers in man-made global warming to skepticism. [See May 15, 2007 report: Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming - Now Skeptics: Growing Number of Scientists Convert to Skeptics After Reviewing New Research – (LINK) -  In addition, an August 2007 report detailed how proponents of man-made global warming fears enjoy a monumental funding advantage over skeptical scientists. (LINK) ]   

  
This report counters the claims made by the promoters of man-made global warming fears that the number of skeptical scientists is dwindling.

  
Examples of “consensus” claims made by promoters of man-made climate fears:   

  
Former Vice President Al Gore (November 5, 2007): “There are still people who believe that the Earth is flat.” (LINK) Gore also compared global warming skeptics to people who "believe the moon landing was actually staged in a movie lot in Arizona." (June 20, 2006 - LINK)   

  
CNN’s Miles O’Brien (July 23, 2007):  "The scientific debate is over," O'Brien said. “We're done." O’Brien also declared on CNN on February 9, 2006 that scientific skeptics of man-made catastrophic global warming “are bought and paid for by the fossil fuel industry, usually.” (LINK)

  
On July 27, 2006, Associated Press reporter Seth Borenstein described a scientist as “one of the few remaining scientists skeptical of the global warming harm caused by industries that burn fossil fuels.” (LINK)

Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, Chairman of the IPCC view on the number of skeptical scientists as quoted on Feb. 20, 2003: “About 300 years ago, a Flat Earth Society was founded by those who did not believe the world was round. That society still exists; it probably has about a dozen members.” (LINK)

Agence France-Press (AFP Press) article (December 4, 2007): The article noted that a prominent skeptic “finds himself increasingly alone in his claim that climate change poses no imminent threat to the planet.”

  

Andrew Dessler in the eco-publication Grist Magazine (November 21, 2007):  “While some people claim there are lots of skeptical climate scientists out there, if you actually try to find one, you keep turning up the same two dozen or so (e.g., Singer, Lindzen, Michaels, Christy, etc., etc.). These skeptics are endlessly recycled by the denial machine, so someone not paying close attention might think there are lots of them out there -- but that's not the case." (LINK)

  

The Washington Post asserted on May 23, 2006 that there were only “a handful of skeptics” of man-made climate fears. (LINK)

  

UN special climate envoy Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland on May 10, 2007 declared the climate debate "over" and added “it's completely immoral, even, to question” the UN’s scientific “consensus." (LINK)

  

ABC News Global Warming Reporter Bill Blakemore reported on August 30, 2006:  “After extensive searches, ABC News has found no such [scientific] debate” on global warming. (LINK)

[ Last edited by dengwh82 on 2008-1-9 at 19:55 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

calanus

木虫 (著名写手)


引用回帖:
Originally posted by flyindusk at 2007-12-29 14:33:
据说在论坛里讨论气候变化的人都是不看也不写相关文章的人

看点相关文章,但写就算了,咱不专业。

其实气候变化本没有什么,如果没有人的存在,“想当然”地希望气候这样、气候那样,气候爱咋咋地。环境恶劣了,自然有许多物种要灭绝,而一旦环境好转了,多样性又慢慢会增多。只是,人,特别是“文明”程度越高的人,不希望这些自然规律作用在自己身上而已。
8楼2007-12-29 21:19:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 13 个回答

solutionzhu

至尊木虫 (正式写手)


dengwh82(金币+0,VIP+0):您好,欢迎您的交流,下次发帖请用正确的发帖格式,谢谢合作,欢迎常来!
不错,新的观点和看法,顶一下
是不是和美国拒绝加入京都议定书有关?呵呵
2楼2007-12-29 10:26:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

smallestworm

金虫 (正式写手)


气候有没有变化,还需要问别人?
自己难道没体会,小时候,那个冷,鹅毛大雪经常见;现在还那么冷,鹅毛大雪还常见?
3楼2007-12-29 11:32:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ian_zhangty

木虫 (著名写手)


引用回帖:
Originally posted by smallestworm at 2007-12-29 11:32:
气候有没有变化,还需要问别人?
自己难道没体会,小时候,那个冷,鹅毛大雪经常见;现在还那么冷,鹅毛大雪还常见?

您活了多大?就知道气候有没有变化?
4楼2007-12-29 12:25:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
☆ 无星级 ★ 一星级 ★★★ 三星级 ★★★★★ 五星级
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见