| 查看: 5564 | 回复: 7 | |||||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||||||
laohubinbin银虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
Reconsider after Revision是什么意思?大家帮忙分析一下已有6人参与
|
||||||
|
投稿到Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 返回的意见没写是“大修”还是“小修”,投稿系统中显示的是“Reconsider after Revision”(第一次看到过这种Decision) 感觉编辑的对稿子态度不是很看好呢。。。 一审意见为: I have some referee comments. We regret that your paper, in its present form, is not acceptable for publication in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics However, if you care to revise it, we will reconsider it for publication. When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. Kindly advise of your plans to resubmit your paper. Reviewer #1: This paper presents a new framework to estimate geometric parameters and perform the pre-bending operation of steel plate before a long bone fracture surgery. A system called "Fracture Assist" is implemented to realize the proposed framework. Five components are well designed to complete the accurate registration of the broken bone models. The novelty and presentation of the paper are good while some places need to be modified shown as follows. 1…… 2…… 3…… Reviewer #2: This paper presents a visual system to assist how surgeons plan to register bone fracture before operation. …… …… (都是正面的意见) There are some errors of sentence representation in this paper. It is hoped that the author can correct it. In conclusion, the research of this paper has an important applicant value. Reviewer #3: The paper deals with an interesting topic but at present the paper organisation presents many lacks in the experimental validation that doesn't underlines the advantages and disadvantages that the proposed method provide. I suggest to the authors to integrate this part making comparison with other available methodologies and proposing a more structured validation also in term of sample significance [ Last edited by laohubinbin on 2013-12-11 at 20:22 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志,到最后选publishing options时页面空白,不能完成投稿
已经有15人回复
职称评审没过,求安慰
已经有13人回复
毕业后当辅导员了,天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
EST投稿状态问题
已经有4人回复
聘U V热熔胶研究人员
已经有10人回复
求助文献
已经有3人回复
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有10人回复
投稿返修后收到这样的回复,还有希望吗
已经有8人回复
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
谈谈两天一夜的“延安行”
已经有13人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
各位大牛,如此意见,能否录用?
已经有22人回复
请大家帮忙看看这个审查意见是什么意思啊
已经有7人回复
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
ziyeweng
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 78 (初中生)
- 金币: 12705.7
- 散金: 5
- 红花: 100
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 1478
- 在线: 820.2小时
- 虫号: 898876
- 注册: 2009-11-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
laohubinbin
银虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 28547
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 2770
- 在线: 246.8小时
- 虫号: 891944
- 注册: 2009-11-03
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
summerbear
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2060.4
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 104
- 在线: 42.5小时
- 虫号: 575311
- 注册: 2008-06-18
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 生物大分子结构与功能
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖













回复此楼