9ÔÂ11ÈÕÒ»ÉóÒâ¼ûÈçÏÂ
1) Most important, I cannot find any innovation in the manuscript. The main idea has no obvious difference with previous literatures.
2) The simulations and discussions are too coarse for a scientific paper.
Éó¸åÈËû¸øÊ²Ã´ÊµÖÊÐÔµÄÒâ¼û È»ºó¾ÍÒª¾ÜÎÒÎÄÕ£¬»¹ºÃ±à¼ÓÖÈÃÎÒÍÆ¼öÉó¸åÈ˸øÎÒµÚ¶þ´Î»ú»á
11ÔÂ20Èձ༸øÎÒ·¢À´ÁË2ÉóÒâ¼û
This revised manuscript can be accepted now. However, I still list two minor points:
С¸ÄÁËÏÂ
11ÔÂ22ÈÕͶ³öÁË
½ñÌì½ÓÊÕÁË ÎÄÕÂÀú¾°ëÄ겨ÕÛ