[求助] PRL这样回复，还可以再投吗？ 已有1人参与

收到PRL编辑的邮件（附下），投稿系统显示（见图片）。请问这是被拒了？还是说可以修改后再投？谢谢~~ Dear xxx, We have considered your manuscript and conclude that it is not suited for Physical Review Letters. We make no judgment on the correctness or technical aspects of your work.  However, from our understanding of the paper's physics results, context, and motivation, we conclude that your paper does not meet the Physical Review Letters criteria of impact, innovation, and interest. Our criteria require a clear justification for consideration of the paper by PRL, rather than by a specialized journal. Your work appears better suited for submittal to the latter. [Please see our recent editorial http://prl.aps.org/edannounce/PhysRevLett.111.180001 (2013).] In view of our assessment, we are not sending your manuscript out for review. We might consider a revised version of your paper, but only if it makes a transparent and compelling case for publication in PRL, as opposed to a more specialized journal. If a version arrives that makes this case well, we may decide that anonymous review is warranted. If we continue to find the manuscript unsuitable for review, possibly following input from a Divisional Associate Editor, we will inform you promptly. Yours sincerely, Serena Dalena Assistant Editor Physical Review Letters Email: prl@aps.org http://prl.aps.org/ APS Partners with ORCID Link your identifier via https://authors.aps.org/Profile IMPORTANT: Editorial "Review Changes" http://publish.aps.org/edannounce/PhysRevLett.111.180001 P.S. For future reference, your paper is also too long for a Letter;      see appended form. PROBLEMS WITH MANUSCRIPT: The following problems were noted in your manuscript. * We prefer figures to be submitted electronically for all manuscripts.   Our file preference is PostScript or Encapsulated PostScript (EPS).   Each electronic figure (or well-separated figure part) should be   contained in a separate file and clearly labeled. For Word and PDF   submissions, all textual material AND figures should be in a single   file but we do need separate electronic figure files as well for   production purposes. PostScript files should print correctly on a   PostScript printer that has not had any fonts or scripts downloaded   to it. See   http://publish.aps.org/authors/w ... nes-physical-review   for further details. WORD COUNT    The guidelines used to determine the word count can be found at    http://publish.aps.org/authors/length-guide   Figure   Aspect Ratio   Wide?   Word Equivalent      1         1.63         No        112      2         1.63         No        112      3         1.44         No        124      4         0.62         No        261      5         0.62         No        261      6         0.62         No        261      7         1.44         No        124      8         0.41         No        385      9         1.30         No        135     10         1.30         No        135   Table   Lines   Wide?   Word Equivalent      1       9     No        72 WORD COUNT SUMMARY     Note: Text word count excludes title, abstract, byline, PACS,           receipt date, acknowledgments, and references.               Text word count   3406         Equations word equiv.    240           Figures word equiv.   1910            Tables word equiv.     72                               ------                        TOTAL    5628 (Maximum length is 3500) 截图01.jpg [ Last edited by MDeFF2012 on 2013-12-7 at 22:02 ]

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

Phys Rev Lett

» 猜你喜欢

• 论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了 已经有12人回复
• 2025年遐想 已经有4人回复
• 投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球 已经有8人回复
• 求个博导看看 已经有18人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

• 评最近很火的“研究生了，你会查文献吗”查文献法 已经有2人回复
• 我那苦逼的生物学屌丝逆袭之路（二） 已经有0人回复
• 一篇文章的漫长投稿过程 已经有139人回复