| 查看: 2041 | 回复: 9 | |||
youbindi木虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
如何回答专家推荐的参考文献？ 50金币奖励，等最终录用散500。
|
|
Reviewer #1: The paper has been revised following the comments and questions arised by the reviewers. One last comment is related to some papers recently appeared on ACTA ASTRONAUTCA which address similar problem studied by the authors. In particular they could take a look to: Very large space structures: Non-linear control and robustness to structural uncertainties Acta Astronautica, Volume 93, January 2014, Pages 252-265 P.Gasbarri, R.Monti, M.Sabatini Control-oriented modelization of a satellite with large flexible appendages and use of worst-case analysis to verify robustness to model uncertainties of attitude control Acta Astronautica, Volume 81, Issue 1, December 2012, Pages 214-226 P. Gasbarri, R.Monti, G.Campolo, C.Toglia 以上是专家的审稿意见，如何回答呢？希望能提供详细回答这样问题的模版或语言，感谢我亲爱的虫友们。 奖励50金币（可追加），等最终录用散500。立贴为证。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
295分求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
294求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
山东双非院校考核超级无底线，领导幸灾乐祸，教师遭殃恐
已经有8人回复
-
0854求调剂
已经有25人回复
-
一志愿沪9，326求生物学调剂
已经有11人回复
-
322求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
本人女孩
已经有10人回复
-
二苯甲酮酸类衍生物
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿中科大材料与化工，353分还有调剂学校吗
已经有11人回复
-
335求调剂
已经有23人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
guoguo8034
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 142.5
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 49
- 在线: 12.5小时
- 虫号: 2495106
- 注册: 2013-06-04
- 专业: 电磁场与波
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
youbindi: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案, 谢谢提供。 2013-12-05 13:29:42
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
youbindi: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案, 谢谢提供。 2013-12-05 13:29:42
| Thank you very much for your comments. We have read several excellent papers you suggested, and cited them in the revised vision. Readers would benefit from the cited literatures. The revised contents are as follows: |
2楼2013-12-05 09:32:39
youbindi
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2577.2
- 散金: 1469
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1138
- 在线: 627.4小时
- 虫号: 666133
- 注册: 2008-12-01
- 专业: 机械动力学
3楼2013-12-05 13:30:47
4楼2013-12-05 14:44:57
毛毛龙
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5523.4
- 散金: 676
- 红花: 3
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 855
- 在线: 177.1小时
- 虫号: 1492694
- 注册: 2011-11-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 安全科学与工程
5楼2013-12-05 15:16:47
marineman
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
爱八卦爱生活
- 应助: 486 (硕士)
- 金币: 26140.4
- 散金: 7934
- 红花: 36
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 7798
- 在线: 279.7小时
- 虫号: 255556
- 注册: 2006-05-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 等离子体物理
6楼2013-12-05 15:38:52
7楼2013-12-05 20:51:23
guoguo8034
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 142.5
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 49
- 在线: 12.5小时
- 虫号: 2495106
- 注册: 2013-06-04
- 专业: 电磁场与波
8楼2013-12-07 07:55:54
戴钢盔的猪头
木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 200 (高中生)
- 金币: 5083.9
- 散金: 1310
- 红花: 18
- 帖子: 6001
- 在线: 319.9小时
- 虫号: 2854040
- 注册: 2013-12-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 波谱分析与成像分析
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
youbindi: 金币+10, ★★★★★最佳答案, 您是个热心肠的小伙伴。 2013-12-07 10:14:37
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
youbindi: 金币+10, ★★★★★最佳答案, 您是个热心肠的小伙伴。 2013-12-07 10:14:37
|
一般这种情况的话很有可能这篇文章就是审稿人写的或者与审稿人关系好的人写的。 我一篇文章也碰到过这情况，初审俩审稿人一大修一小修。大修的那个其实没提啥意见，但其中一条就是要加一篇参考文献。 我后来是这么写的: The literature mentioned by Reviewer # is indeed very instructive for our current study. Actually, in our first manuscript before submission, there were several more paragraphs discussing ...（跟那篇文献相关的内容） In those paragraphs, we cited ...（此处就是那篇审稿人提到的文献） Those paragraphs were deleted later in consideration of the article length. However, we did not mean to omit the literature. We sincerely admit that it was our mistake, although it was made not on purpose. We thank Reviewer # very much for kindly reminding us the literature we omitted. The literature has now been included in the revised manuscript (highlighted in red in the References). Corresponding amendments are listed below: ...（这里在修改的手稿中再稍微添加几句关于那个文献的内容） 后来复审一周就通过啦。老外也是要面子的嘛，给足他面子他总归还是不会为难你的。祝愿楼主的文章早日被接收。 [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ] |
9楼2013-12-07 09:37:07
|
， [ 发自小木虫客户端 ] |
10楼2013-12-10 22:25:28
20