24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wuwuxuxu

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 9 (幼儿园)
金币: 416.5
散金: 30
红花: 1
帖子: 265
在线: 68.3小时
虫号: 1008580
注册: 2010-04-29
性别: MM
专业: 信号理论与信号处理

[求助] 是不是被SCI录用了?能不能帮忙看看这个修改意见，好改吗？谢谢啦！！

Dear Research of Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor N XXX

We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "Research of Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network in Coal Mine Goaf", submitted to
Wireless Personal Communications

Based on the advice received, I have decided that your manuscript can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections as suggested by the reviewer(s).

Attached, please find the reviewers' comments for your perusal.

"If one or more reviewers have uploaded files related to their reviews, these files can be accessed by clicking on this link:

Alternatively, the file(s) can be downloaded from your main menu by clicking on 'View Reviewer Attachments'.

Please note that this link will not be available when there are no reviewer attachments."

5Comments for the Author:

Reviewer #1: Suggestions for improvements:
1- Title is suggested to be changed as the "research in routing protocol for wireless sensor network in Coal Mine Goaf" is very general title and not reflecting specific research work proposed in this paper.  Suggested title " proposal for efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor network in Coal Mine Goaf"
2- Abstract should highlight more the significance of the work in comparison with finding from literature to give the sense of research gap highlighted.
3- Please consider more nearest research and most updated ones as the author almost 85% depends on papers from 2007 and beyond and some of them chinese language.
4- Table-2 summarizing the processes of proposed algorithm is better to be represented in flowchart reflecting the proposed author methodologies.
5- Some sentences are ambiguous and should be considered in better phrasing for English paper publication. Example: "As coal mine goaf cannot be accessed by man".
6- Suggestions to evaluate the proposed algorithm with similar near-field algorithms in literature in term of algorithm complexity and computational cost.

Reviewer #2: Authors have proposed a protocol  named  USEB-CMF  to improve the safety of the monitoring system of coal mines. However paper has some issues: -
1) Some more related work should be included.
2) Architecture should be explained in more detail.
3) Algorithm/Pseudo code is not properly written and explained.
4) Some more work should be done for journal paper.

Reviewer #3: Overall paper need to proof read for errors e.g.  "transmission powder" in section 2 and
"COMPTE_MSG" in algorithm 1

回复此楼