| 查看: 387 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价1次，作者tobyjerry增加金币 1 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
[【转贴】A Dictionary of Science (Oxford Paperback Reference) 【已搜索】
|
||
 A Dictionary of Science (Oxford Paperback Reference) By John Daintith Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA Number Of Pages: 896 Publication Date: 2005-09-16 ISBN-10 / ASIN: 0192806416 ISBN-13 / EAN: 9780192806413 Binding: Paperback This best-selling dictionary contains over 9,000 entries on all aspects of science. It provides comprehensive coverage of biology (including human biology), chemistry, physics, the earth sciences, and astronomy. The entries are supported by over 200 clear diagrams and illustrations, and fully cross-referenced for ease of use. Other features include short biographies of leading scientists, full page illustrated features on subjects such as the Solar System and Genetically Modified Organisms, and chronologies of specific scientific subjects including plastics, electronics, and cell biology. Both concise and wide-ranging, this dictionary is an ideal handy reference work for students, and a great introduction for non-scientists. Summary: The best choice for those who read a lot of popular science Rating: 5 This is a relatively inexpensive, concise, and handy dictionary of science. It is an updated version of the Concise Science Dictionary originally published by the Oxford University Press in 1984. This, the latest edition, is from 1999. It is aimed at professionals and an educated public who want a quick reference to terms in fields other than their own. Unlike science dictionaries found on the reference shelves of libraries, this book is small enough to fit into a knapsack. As with all specialized dictionaries the task for editors is to decide what to leave in and what to leave out, and how technical to get. The people at Oxford University Press, one of the preeminent publishers of reference books in the world, have tried to eschew "unnecessary scientific jargon" while "always bearing in mind the needs of the readers" (from the Preface). Nonetheless, many of the entries are highly technical, having been written by experts. Clearly the editors have decided to err on the side of technical precision rather than anything resembling a dumbing down. The entry on "optical activity" for example is a mini essay of about 400 words adorned with a drawing of the D-, L-, and meso-forms of the isomers of tartaric acid along with several cross references to related terms in the dictionary. A two-page boxed entry on "El Nino" however is written in language easily accessible to the average high school graduate, as are many other entries including over 160 mini biographies of important scientists. I also use The American Heritage Dictionary of Science, another handy (as opposed to comprehensive) reference and would like to make a quick comparison. The Heritage dictionary is a hardcover and contains noticeably more entries (16,000+ to perhaps 10,000 to 12,000 for the Oxford). However the Heritage hasn't been updated since the edition of 1988. Of course a lot has happened in science since then, which is why I purchased the Oxford paperback. The Heritage also uses the entries words or phrases in sentences, usually quoting some scientist whereas the Oxford does not bother. The Heritage also gives the pronunciation of most of the entries (e.g., it's "pree'-on," not "pri'-on" for the mad cow infectious agent) whereas the Oxford does not. The Oxford is more technical overall--it is especially strong in physics--and of course more up to date. The entries also tend to be more thorough. For example, the Oxford has a schematic drawing of a mammalian kidney system whereas the Heritage has only text. There are seven appendices on SI units, fundamental constants, the solar system, the geographical time scale, plant and animal kingdom classifications, and the periodic table. Curiously, nowhere in the Oxford is the abbreviation SI defined or even noted! The Heritage gives it as the French Systeme International d'Unites (or International System of Units). This is actually an indication of how the Oxford assumes a greater scientific sophistication on the part of its readers than does the Heritage. Bottom line here is that this book is practically a must for those who read a lot of science in fields other than their own. It is better overall than the Heritage because it is eleven years more up to date; and it is a better choice for most people than the more comprehensive hardcover volumes which are significantly more expensive, heavier and take up more space. 下载地址： http://mihd.net/m4ceh3 http://www.mediafire.com/?3zcc30hywef http://rapidshare.com/files/7687 ... e__5th_Edition_.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/76871861/ADS5thED.rar.html http://depositfiles.com/files/2727212 http://rapidshare.com/files/76965954/A_Dictionary_of_Science.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/76918366/A_Dictionary_of_Science.rar |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有11人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有10人回复
2楼2007-12-18 11:22:31
10