| 查看: 1348 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
I ‘m very glum about the country ’s family planning!
|
|||
I ‘m very glum about the country ’s family planning! |
» 猜你喜欢
极限拉扯,如何抉择
已经有16人回复
40+中年人失业后,还能找到好工作吗?
已经有16人回复
人工智能虚构史料、伪造文献频现,多家期刊声明抵制
已经有4人回复
CsPbI2Br全无机钙钛矿SEM图像异常分析
已经有8人回复
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有9人回复
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗?
已经有12人回复
tuqin2575
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
专家
- ESEPI: 42
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.681
- 金币: 5636.5
- 散金: 469
- 红花: 36
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 2701
- 在线: 234.6小时
- 虫号: 1543081
- 注册: 2011-12-19
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 农业水利
★ ★ ★ ★
00waterh: 金币+4, the earth a smaller size of family may be better. However, in ethics it is quite awkward 2013-11-18 21:30:22
00waterh: 回帖置顶 2013-11-18 21:31:17
00waterh: 金币+4, the earth a smaller size of family may be better. However, in ethics it is quite awkward 2013-11-18 21:30:22
00waterh: 回帖置顶 2013-11-18 21:31:17
|
Some day I analyzed that: the pairs of whom each is the only generation in his family and both of whom hold the rural household registrations are allowed to give birth to the second child. Then unfortunately, the pair with one in urban household, the other in rural household does not have that right. But in rural families, maybe 80% of them has more than one kid. You can see, it is a little unfair and ridiculous though I have no plan on that. For the suatainble development of our country and the earth a smaller size of family may be better. However, in ethics it is quite awkward. [ Last edited by tuqin2575 on 2013-11-18 at 19:01 ] |

12楼2013-11-18 18:46:29
5楼2013-11-14 14:16:51
Lopemann
荣誉版主 (职业作家)
聽真那自由在奏鳴
-

专家经验: +184 - ESEPI: 55
- 应助: 18 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.779
- 金币: 1112.7
- 散金: 2024
- 红花: 29
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 4528
- 在线: 597.3小时
- 虫号: 1932129
- 注册: 2012-08-09
- 专业: 应用数学方法
- 管辖: English Cafe

6楼2013-11-14 14:18:46
cyy__8906
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1067.7
- 散金: 76
- 帖子: 286
- 在线: 68.6小时
- 虫号: 2153604
- 注册: 2012-11-28
- 专业: 泛函分析
7楼2013-11-14 14:40:09










回复此楼