| 查看: 673 | 回复: 1 | |||||
star_zhang禁虫 (文学泰斗)
臣本布衣,躬耕西洋
|
[交流]
【读写翻译绝招35】雅思写作范文:政府应该为艺术买单吗? 已有1人参与
|
|
【读写翻译绝招35】雅思写作范文:政府应该为艺术买单吗? 【题目】 Some people think the government should spend more money on public services rather than wasting money on art. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 这题要讨论的是:政府应该为艺术发展买单,还是应该专注民生,完善公共服务。那像这类题目,双方都很难完全否定,因此“一边倒”的写法并不容易。 范文采取的是更容易下手的双面写法,即“双方都肯定,重点讨论有争议的一方”。 【范文】 (1) With the development of modern society, governments are allocating more funds to building art galleries, theatres or supporting the life and work of artists. Some people disapprove the governments’ decisions and insist that the money should be spent on public services to improve people’s living standard in a more direct way. In my view, however, although funding public services is essential to social development, art is also an indispensable part of the society that should be valued. (2) It is true that establishing public services is the top priority of the government. It provides for basic human needs and guarantees the stability of the society. In China, people have been relying on public services since the day of birth. They receive education in schools founded and supported by the government. When they are sick, the government helps paying for the medical care. Besides, everybody enjoys the public facilities like highways, parks, libraries and so forth which all come from government investments. (3) However, this does not mean that the government spending money on art is unnecessary. Although people donot feed on art, it is still their natural instinct to pursue beauty. Once the survival needs are met, people start seeking spiritual fulfillments by creating and appreciating art, which helps them to calm down and relax after long hours of labor. Naturally, apart from bread and milk, the government should also take care of the spiritual life of common people. (4) Admittedly, with successful commercialised operation, many art groups perform well and donot need the financial support from the government. Yet, there are still ones that depend on government funding. For example, Peking Opera, which is a valuable cultural inheritance of China, might not have survived and thrived without the promotion by the government. It is the same with many other art forms of art all over the world. (5) In conclusion, it is the government’s duty to facilitate public services that provide for the basic needs of citizens. Nevertheless, art is also an important part of human life and deserves equal attention and support from the government. 【解析】 这篇文章中,Eileen采用了经典的“五段式”。 开头是标准的“引入-对方观点-我方论点”模式,提出核心论点:“虽然公共服务对社会发展至关重要,但艺术也是社会生活中不可或缺的重要环节。” 三个主体段的分配如下: 1. public service的重要性 2. art也是人们生活中的重要环节 3. 确实有一些艺术团体通过商业运作可以自给自足,无需政府补贴,但仍有一些艺术门类需要政府的支持(举例,如京剧,Peking Opera)→对争议点的解释 <THE END> |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
英语积累 | English |
» 猜你喜欢
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗?
已经有7人回复
常年博士招收(双一流,工科)
已经有4人回复
推荐一本书
已经有10人回复
纳米粒子粒径的测量
已经有6人回复
溴的反应液脱色
已经有4人回复
参与限项
已经有5人回复
有没有人能给点建议
已经有5人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法,现在跑or等等看?
已经有4人回复
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
遇见快乐
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 61 (初中生)
- 金币: 6190.8
- 散金: 333
- 红花: 15
- 帖子: 1288
- 在线: 557.8小时
- 虫号: 2454698
- 注册: 2013-05-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料的磨损与磨蚀
2楼2013-11-04 08:27:33












回复此楼
