| ²é¿´: 2690 | »Ø¸´: 36 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
[½»Á÷]
¶þÉ󻨏´ÐÅ£¬¸±±à¼Ìá³öÒ»¸öÑÏËàµÄÎÊÌ⣬²»ÖªµÀÖеĿÉÄÜÐÔ´ó²»´ó
|
|||
|
Dear Dr. : Manuscript ** entitled** which you submitted to Journal of Separation Science has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewers are enclosed at the bottom of this message or attached to this email. A newly revised version of your manuscript that takes into account the comments of the reviewers will be reconsidered for publication. Please note that submitting a revision of your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your revision may be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is rendered. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the Journal of Separation Science. I look forward to receiving your revision. Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Separation Science Associate Editor I am afraid that this paper will not likely be acceptable until this comment is addressed (previously from reviewer 2) One of the reviewers has re-evaluated the revised version and believes that this point has been inadequately addressed. Indeed, the authors failed to even provide a response to this comment in their rebuttal, which is wholly unacceptable. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÊÛSCI-T0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8O.5.5.1.O.54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8O.5.5.1O.54,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿ÉÊ®¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.55.1.O.54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿ÉÙ¤¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÎÒ¾ÍÊÇÉêÇëÒ»¸öÃæÉÏÏîÄ¿¶øÒÑ£¬ÕâÆÀÉóÒâ¼ûÊǰ´ÕÕ½ÜÇàµÄÌõ¼þÆÀµÄ°É£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.55.1.O.54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿ÉÙ¤¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÓжàÉÙÈËÊǽñÌì²éϵͳ֪µÀ½á¹ûµÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
¹ú×ÔÈ»ÆÀÉóÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ϊʲô×ÊÖúÊý¸÷´ó¸ßУ¶¼´´Ð¸ߣ¬×Ô¼ºÉêÇëÔõô¾ÍÕâôÄÑ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¹ú×ÔÈ»ÃæÉϸ´ÅÌ~»¶ÓÌÖÂÛ
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
ϵͳ²é²»µ½
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
36Â¥2013-11-05 09:34:27
2Â¥2013-11-02 11:15:08
zhchzhsh2076
ľ³æÖ®Íõ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
- Ó¦Öú: 8 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 102692
- Ìû×Ó: 126972
- ÔÚÏß: 11423.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1481173
6Â¥2013-11-02 11:20:01
¼òµ¥»Ø¸´
zhchzhsh20765Â¥
2013-11-02 11:19
»Ø¸´
ÓÀ²»ÑÔÆúnsn(½ð±Ò+1): лл²ÎÓë












»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ͶƱ:
30