24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

永不言弃nsn

木虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1729.3
帖子: 297
在线: 466.8小时
虫号: 1438366

[交流] 二审回复信，副编辑提出一个严肃的问题，不知道中的可能性大不大

Dear Dr. :

Manuscript ** entitled** which you submitted to Journal of Separation Science has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewers are enclosed at the bottom of this message or attached to this email.
A newly revised version of your manuscript that takes into account the comments of the reviewers will be reconsidered for publication.
Please note that submitting a revision of your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your revision may be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is rendered.
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the Journal of Separation Science. I look forward to receiving your revision.
Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Separation Science

Associate Editor

I am afraid that this paper will not likely be acceptable until this comment is addressed (previously from reviewer 2)
One of the reviewers has re-evaluated the revised version and believes that this point has been inadequately addressed. Indeed, the authors failed to even provide a response to this comment in their rebuttal, which is wholly unacceptable.

回复此楼