| 查看: 2683 | 回复: 36 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
二审回复信，副编辑提出一个严肃的问题，不知道中的可能性大不大
|
|||
|
Dear Dr. : Manuscript ** entitled** which you submitted to Journal of Separation Science has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewers are enclosed at the bottom of this message or attached to this email. A newly revised version of your manuscript that takes into account the comments of the reviewers will be reconsidered for publication. Please note that submitting a revision of your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your revision may be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is rendered. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the Journal of Separation Science. I look forward to receiving your revision. Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Separation Science Associate Editor I am afraid that this paper will not likely be acceptable until this comment is addressed (previously from reviewer 2) One of the reviewers has re-evaluated the revised version and believes that this point has been inadequately addressed. Indeed, the authors failed to even provide a response to this comment in their rebuttal, which is wholly unacceptable. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
国自然评审意见
已经有15人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有13人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有14人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有11人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有18人回复
-
有没有仍没收到信息的
已经有3人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有8人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有11人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有9人回复
-
2026年叶企孙基金
已经有6人回复
26楼2013-11-04 15:14:07
2楼2013-11-02 11:15:08
6楼2013-11-02 11:20:01
简单回复
2013-11-02 11:19
回复
永不言弃nsn(金币+1): 谢谢参与
30