| 查看: 398 | 回复: 0 | ||
lemonbaobao金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
论文修改求助，审稿人提到了raft like particles
|
急求！！！！ 我的论文里面对于催化剂的表征，XRD和TEM测出来的平均粒径比较小，而CO吸附算出来的比较大，所以审稿人提了这么一段话。建议assuming more raft like (instead of spherical) particles。 可是我查了文献，里面没教假设raft like particle怎么算粒径啊？？？ 另外，Pd/CNTs的催化剂还有什么比CO化学吸附更准确的测量方法么？ 我该怎么办？？？  下面是审稿人的意见： “The discrepancies between the particle sizes obtained from the TEM and CO chemisorptions is a little troubling (pg. 13 and top of pg. 14). It’s always tricky to get these particle sizes correct, by either method. Perhaps the authors should re-check their calculations, assuming more raft like (instead of spherical) particles, to determine if this would provide better agreement. At least, they should specify the adsorbed CO molecular surface area that they used, where they obtained this value from, and maybe search to see if better alternatives for CO/Pd exist. Note that the TEM-XRD agreement is pretty good, which calls into question the CO chemisorption” 各位大侠，帮帮我吧！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有22人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有16人回复
-
越来越担心硕士毕业后没有竞争力了
已经有14人回复
-
论文的挂名怎么评判贡献？基金申请中，排名第一的挂名文章
已经有3人回复
-
申博自荐 2篇一区TOP+1篇EI+2公开发明专利 2027博士申请
已经有3人回复
-
闲聊
已经有6人回复
-
申博求助
已经有4人回复