| 查看: 376 | 回复: 0 | ||
lemonbaobao金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
论文修改求助，审稿人提到了raft like particles
|
急求！！！！ 我的论文里面对于催化剂的表征，XRD和TEM测出来的平均粒径比较小，而CO吸附算出来的比较大，所以审稿人提了这么一段话。建议assuming more raft like (instead of spherical) particles。 可是我查了文献，里面没教假设raft like particle怎么算粒径啊？？？ 另外，Pd/CNTs的催化剂还有什么比CO化学吸附更准确的测量方法么？ 我该怎么办？？？  下面是审稿人的意见： “The discrepancies between the particle sizes obtained from the TEM and CO chemisorptions is a little troubling (pg. 13 and top of pg. 14). It’s always tricky to get these particle sizes correct, by either method. Perhaps the authors should re-check their calculations, assuming more raft like (instead of spherical) particles, to determine if this would provide better agreement. At least, they should specify the adsorbed CO molecular surface area that they used, where they obtained this value from, and maybe search to see if better alternatives for CO/Pd exist. Note that the TEM-XRD agreement is pretty good, which calls into question the CO chemisorption” 各位大侠，帮帮我吧！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
听说今天filecode变了
已经有39人回复
-
固定端突然变了，今天
已经有8人回复
-
filecode
已经有15人回复
-
基金中了
已经有8人回复
-
filecode
已经有11人回复
-
大家散了吧，后缀研究没有意义，别浪费时间了，过好目前的每一天，不要焦虑
已经有6人回复
-
一个有机合成实验室都需要哪些设备？
已经有12人回复
-
求各位大神看下
已经有33人回复
-
咨询面上基金
已经有7人回复
-
影响面上的因素
已经有11人回复
50