| 查看: 340 | 回复: 0 | ||
lemonbaobao金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
论文修改求助，审稿人提到了raft like particles
|
急求！！！！ 我的论文里面对于催化剂的表征，XRD和TEM测出来的平均粒径比较小，而CO吸附算出来的比较大，所以审稿人提了这么一段话。建议assuming more raft like (instead of spherical) particles。 可是我查了文献，里面没教假设raft like particle怎么算粒径啊？？？ 另外，Pd/CNTs的催化剂还有什么比CO化学吸附更准确的测量方法么？ 我该怎么办？？？  下面是审稿人的意见： “The discrepancies between the particle sizes obtained from the TEM and CO chemisorptions is a little troubling (pg. 13 and top of pg. 14). It’s always tricky to get these particle sizes correct, by either method. Perhaps the authors should re-check their calculations, assuming more raft like (instead of spherical) particles, to determine if this would provide better agreement. At least, they should specify the adsorbed CO molecular surface area that they used, where they obtained this value from, and maybe search to see if better alternatives for CO/Pd exist. Note that the TEM-XRD agreement is pretty good, which calls into question the CO chemisorption” 各位大侠，帮帮我吧！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有6人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有4人回复
-
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有6人回复
-
球磨粉体时遇到了大的问题，请指教！
已经有15人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有5人回复
-
江汉大学解明教授课题组招博士研究生/博士后
已经有3人回复