| 查看: 361 | 回复: 0 | ||
lemonbaobao金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
论文修改求助，审稿人提到了raft like particles
|
急求！！！！ 我的论文里面对于催化剂的表征，XRD和TEM测出来的平均粒径比较小，而CO吸附算出来的比较大，所以审稿人提了这么一段话。建议assuming more raft like (instead of spherical) particles。 可是我查了文献，里面没教假设raft like particle怎么算粒径啊？？？ 另外，Pd/CNTs的催化剂还有什么比CO化学吸附更准确的测量方法么？ 我该怎么办？？？  下面是审稿人的意见： “The discrepancies between the particle sizes obtained from the TEM and CO chemisorptions is a little troubling (pg. 13 and top of pg. 14). It’s always tricky to get these particle sizes correct, by either method. Perhaps the authors should re-check their calculations, assuming more raft like (instead of spherical) particles, to determine if this would provide better agreement. At least, they should specify the adsorbed CO molecular surface area that they used, where they obtained this value from, and maybe search to see if better alternatives for CO/Pd exist. Note that the TEM-XRD agreement is pretty good, which calls into question the CO chemisorption” 各位大侠，帮帮我吧！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
医学类期刊求推荐
已经有5人回复
-
生活琐事由它去
已经有4人回复
-
提交了我也来说说感想
已经有12人回复
-
青B发送上会通知了吗
已经有9人回复
-
西安交大新媒学院副院长用撤稿论文结题
已经有6人回复
-
论文撤稿了
已经有8人回复
-
化学专业申博
已经有4人回复
-
某211大学教师把个人教师官方主页改成:我跑了我跑了我跑了!官宣跑路！
已经有5人回复
-
26/27申博自荐
已经有9人回复
-
博士申请
已经有3人回复