| 查看: 756 | 回复: 3 | |||
[交流]
迄今为止我看到的作者群最为牛叉的文章
|
|
Science前主编于9月20日发表了《Standing up for GMOs》的社论，其作者是本人见到最为牛叉的，有多位诺贝尔奖获得者以及。 http://www.sciencemag.org/content/341/6152/1320.full Science 20 September 2013: Vol. 341 no. 6152 p. 1320 DOI: 10.1126/science.1245017 Standing Up for GMOs Bruce Alberts1, Roger Beachy2, David Baulcombe3, Gunter Blobel4, Swapan Datta5, Nina Fedoroff6, Donald Kennedy7, Gurdev S. Khush8, Jim Peacock9, Martin Rees10, Phillip Sharp11 1Bruce Alberts is President Emeritus of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and former Editor-in-Chief of Science. 2Roger Beachy is a Wolf Prize laureate; President Emeritus of the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA; and former director of the U.S. National Institute of Food and Agriculture. 3David Baulcombe is a Wolf Prize laureate and Royal Society Professor in the Department of Plant Sciences of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. He receives research funding from Syngenta and is a consultant for Syngenta. 4Gunter Blobel is a Nobel laureate and the John D. Rockefeller Jr. Professor at the Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA. 5Swapan Datta is Deputy Director General (Crop Science) of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India; the Rash Behari Ghosh Chair Professor at Calcutta University, India; and a former scientist at ETH-Zurich, Switzerland, and at IRRI, Philippines. 6Nina Fedoroff is a National Medal of Science laureate; a Distinguished Professor at the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia; an Evan Pugh Professor at Pennylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA; and former President of AAAS. 7Donald Kennedy is President Emeritus of Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, and former Editor-in-Chief of Science. 8Gurdev S. Khush is a World Food Prize laureate, Japan Prize laureate, and former scientist at IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines. 9Jim Peacock is a former Chief Scientist of Australia and former Chief of the Division of Plant Industry at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra, Australia. 10Martin Rees is President Emeritus of the Royal Society, Fellow of Trinity College, and Emeritus Professor of Cosmology and Astrophysics at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 11Phillip Sharp is a Nobel laureate; an Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; and President of AAAS. Figure CREDIT: IRRI On 8 August 2013, vandals destroyed a Philippine “Golden Rice” field trial. Officials and staff of the Philippine Department of Agriculture that conduct rice tests for the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and the Philippine Rice Research Institute (PhilRice) had gathered for a peaceful dialogue. They were taken by surprise when protesters invaded the compound, overwhelmed police and village security, and trampled the rice. Billed as an uprising of farmers, the destruction was actually carried out by protesters trucked in overnight in a dozen jeepneys. The global scientific community has condemned the wanton destruction of these field trials, gathering thousands of supporting signatures in a matter of days.* If ever there was a clear-cut cause for outrage, it is the concerted campaign by Greenpeace and other nongovernmental organizations, as well as by individuals, against Golden Rice. Golden Rice is a strain that is genetically modified by molecular techniques (and therefore labeled a genetically modified organism or GMO) to produce β-carotene, a precursor of vitamin A. Vitamin A is an essential component of the light-absorbing molecule rhodopsin in the eye. Severe vitamin A deficiency results in blindness, and half of the roughly half-million children who are blinded by it die within a year. Vitamin A deficiency also compromises immune system function, exacerbating many kinds of illnesses. It is a disease of poverty and poor diet, responsible for 1.9 to 2.8 million preventable deaths annually, mostly of children under 5 years old and women.† Rice is the major dietary staple for almost half of humanity, but white rice grains lack vitamin A. Research scientists Ingo Potrykus and Peter Beyer and their teams developed a rice variety whose grains accumulate β-carotene. It took them, in collaboration with IRRI, 25 years to develop and test varieties that express sufficient quantities of the precursor that a few ounces of cooked rice can provide enough β-carotene to eliminate the morbidity and mortality of vitamin A deficiency.‡ It took time, as well, to obtain the right to distribute Golden Rice seeds, which contain patented molecular constructs, free of charge to resource-poor farmers. The rice has been ready for farmers to use since the turn of the 21st century, yet it is still not available to them. Escalating requirements for testing have stalled its release for more than a decade. IRRI and PhilRice continue to patiently conduct the required field tests with Golden Rice, despite the fact that these tests are driven by fears of “potential” hazards, with no evidence of actual hazards. Introduced into commercial production over 17 years ago, GM crops have had an exemplary safety record. And precisely because they benefit farmers, the environment, and consumers, GM crops have been adopted faster than any other agricultural advance in the history of humanity. New technologies often evoke rumors of hazard. These generally fade with time when, as in this case, no real hazards emerge. But the anti-GMO fever still burns brightly, fanned by electronic gossip and well-organized fear-mongering that profits some individuals and organizations. We, and the thousands of other scientists who have signed the statement of protest, stand together in staunch opposition to the violent destruction of required tests on valuable advances such as Golden Rice that have the potential to save millions of impoverished fellow humans from needless suffering and death. ↵* B. Chassy et al., “Global scientific community condemns the recent destruction of field trials of Golden Rice in the Philippines”; http://chn.ge/143PyHo (2013). ↵† E. Mayo-Wilson et al., Br. Med. J. 343, d5094 (2011). ↵‡ G. Tang et al., Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 96, 658 (2012). |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
342求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
材料与化工调剂一志愿大连海事085600，349
已经有7人回复
-
一志愿武理材料工程302调剂环化或化工
已经有16人回复
-
311求调剂一志愿合肥工业大学
已经有12人回复
-
环境工程调剂
已经有3人回复
-
288求调剂 一志愿哈工大 材料与化工
已经有22人回复
-
085600，321分求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
282求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
一志愿 南京航空航天大学 ，080500材料科学与工程学硕
已经有11人回复
-
土木304求调剂
已经有3人回复
yeastworm
兑换贵宾
 |
2楼2013-10-14 14:00:42
3楼2013-10-15 07:09:42
xxxy12005
实习版主
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 223.5
- 散金: 120
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 404
- 在线: 99.4小时
- 虫号: 1899928
- 注册: 2012-07-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 蛋白质组学
没有证据表明有害就是好的了……不得不承认美国在转基因方面获得了很多
4楼2013-10-15 23:22:38
