| ²é¿´: 209 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
moyamoya665½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÑÎËáÀ×ÂåÎô·Ò(Evista)Ôö¼Ó×äÖÐÏà¹ØËÀÍö·çÏÕ
|
||
|
Raloxifene HCl (Evista) Linked to Increased Risk for Stroke-Related Mortality ÑÎËáÀ×ÂåÎô·Ò(Evista)Ôö¼Ó×äÖÐÏà¹ØËÀÍö·çÏÕ On July 17, the FDA approved safety labeling revisions for raloxifene HCl tablets (Evista; Eli Lilly and Co) to warn of the increased risk for death from stroke. 7ÔÂ17ÈÕ£¬Ê³Æ·Ò©Æ·¼à¶½¹ÜÀí¾Ö£¨FDA£©Í¨¹ý°²È«ÐÔ±êʶÐÞÕý£º¾¯¸æÑÎËáÀ×ÂåÎô·ÒƬ(Evista ; ÃÀ¹úÀñÀ´¹«Ë¾)Ôö¼Ó×äÖÐÏà¹ØËÀÍö·çÏÕ¡£ Previously, the agency warned of the increased risk for venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in women receiving raloxifene . Use of the drug has now been linked to an increased risk for stroke-related mortality. ÔÚÕâ֮ǰ£¬¸Ã»ú¹¹£¨FDA£©¾¯¸æÊ¹ÓÃÀ×ÂåÎô·ÒµÄ¸¾Å®»áÔö¼Ó¾²ÂöѪ˨£¨É¾²ÂöѪ˨ºÍ ·Î˨Èû£©µÄ·çÏÕ£¬ÏÖÔÚÔòÊÇʹÓøÃÒ©»áÔö¼Ó×äÖÐÏà¹ØËÀÍöÂÊ·çÏÕ¡£ In a randomized, double-blind, multinational clinical trial of 10,101 postmenopausal women with documented coronary heart disease or at risk for coronary events , use of raloxifene 60 mg/day for a mean of 5.6 years yielded an increased rate of death from stroke vs placebo (59 [1.2%] vs 39 deaths [0.8%]; 22 vs 15 per 10,000 women-years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 - 2.24; P = .0499). ÔÚ10,101Àý¾ø¾ºó»¼¹ÚÐIJ¡»ò¿ÉÄÜ»¼¹ÚÐIJ¡·çÏյĸ¾Å®ÖнøÐÐËæ»ú£¬Ë«Ã¤¼°¶à¹úµÄÁÙ ´²ÊÔÑ飬Ó밲ο¼Á×éÏà±È£¬Ê¹ÓÃÀ×ÂåÎô·Ò60 mg/Ì죬ƽ¾ùʹÓÃ5.6ÄêµÄÊÔÑé×éÔö¼ÓÁËÒò ×äÖеÄËÀÍöÂÊ£¨ËÀÍöÊý£º59 [1.2%] ±È 39 [0.8%];ÿ10000Ãû¸¾Å®Ã¿Ä꣺22 ±È 15£» Σº¦±È£º1.49£»95£¥ÖÃÐÅÇø¼ä[CI]£º1.00 - 2.24; P = .0499£©¡£ However, the incidence of stroke was not statistically different between groups (249 [4.9%] vs 224 [4.4%]; 9.5 vs 8.6 per 1000 women-years; HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.92 - 1.32; P = .30), and raloxifene had no significant effect on all -cause mortality. È»¶ø£¬×äÖеķ¢²¡ÂÊÔÚ×é¼äûÓÐͳ¼ÆÑ§ÉϵIJîÒì(249 [4.9%] ±È 224 [4.4%]; ÿ1000 Ãû¸¾Å®Ã¿Ä꣺9.5 ±È 8.6 ; Σº¦±È£º 1.10; 95% ÖÃÐÅÇø¼ä£º0.92 - 1.32; P = .30 ) Accordingly, the risk-benefit ratio should be considered in women at risk for stroke, such as a history of previous stroke or transient ischemic attack , atrial fibrillation, hypertension, or cigarette smoking. Because no cardiovascular benefit was observed in the study, raloxifene should not be used for the primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. ÓÉÒÔÉÏ¿´³ö£¬Ó¦¸Ã¿¼ÂǸ¾Å®×äÖеķçÏÕÊÕÒæ±È£¬±ÈÈç×äÖв¡Ê·»ò¶ÌÔÝÐÔȱѪ·¢×÷¡¢ÐÄ ·¿²ü¶¯¡¢¸ßѪѹ»òÊÇ·ñÎüÑÌ¡£ÔÚÑо¿ÖУ¬ÒòΪûÓй۲쵽ÐÄѪ¹Ü·½ÃæµÄºÃ´¦£¬ËùÒÔÀ× ÂåÎô·Ò²»Ó¦ÊÇÊ×Ñ¡»ò´ÎÑ¡µÄÔ¤·ÀÐÄѪ¹Ü¼²²¡µÄÒ©Îï¡£ Raloxifene is indicated for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. À×ÂåÎô·ÒÊÇÓÃÀ´Ô¤·ÀºÍÖÎÁƾø¾ºó¸¾Å®µÄ¹ÇÖÊÊèËÉÖ¢µÄ¡£ ±àÒ룺 ÑÎËáÀ×ÂåÎô·Ò(Evista)Ôö¼Ó×äÖÐÏà¹ØËÀÍö·çÏÕ 7ÔÂ17ÈÕ£¬Ê³Æ·Ò©Æ·¼à¶½¹ÜÀí¾Ö£¨FDA£©Í¨¹ýÁ˰²È«ÐÔ±êʶÐÞÕý£º¾¯¸æÑÎËáÀ×ÂåÎô·ÒƬ (Evista; ÃÀ¹úÀñÀ´¹«Ë¾)»áÔö¼Ó×äÖÐÏà¹ØËÀÍöµÄ·çÏÕ¡£ ÔÚÕâ֮ǰ£¬¸Ã»ú¹¹£¨FDA£©¾¯¸æ£¬Ê¹ÓÃÀ×ÂåÎô·ÒµÄ¸¾Å®»áÔö¼Ó¾²ÂöѪ˨£¨É¾²ÂöѪ˨ ºÍ·Î˨Èû£©µÄ·çÏÕ£¬ÏÖÔÚÔòÊÇʹÓøÃÒ©»áÔö¼Ó×äÖÐÏà¹ØËÀÍöÂÊ·çÏÕ¡£ ÔÚ10,101Àý¾ø¾ºó»¼¹ÚÐIJ¡»ò¿ÉÄÜ»¼¹ÚÐIJ¡·çÏյĸ¾Å®ÖнøÐÐËæ»ú£¬Ë«Ã¤¼°¶à¹úµÄÁÙ ´²ÊÔÑé¡£Ó밲ο¼Á×éÏà±È£¬Ê¹ÓÃÀ×ÂåÎô·Ò60 mg/Ì죬ƽ¾ùʹÓÃ5.6ÄêµÄÊÔÑé×éÔö¼ÓÁËÒò ×äÖеÄËÀÍöÂÊ£¨ËÀÍöÊý£º59 [1.2%] ±È 39 [0.8%];ÿ10000Ãû¸¾Å®Ã¿Ä꣺22 ±È 15£» Σº¦±È£º1.49£»95£¥ÖÃÐÅÇø¼ä[CI]£º1.00 - 2.24; P = .0499£©¡£ È»¶ø£¬×äÖеķ¢²¡ÂÊÔÚ×é¼äûÓÐͳ¼ÆÑ§ÉϵIJîÒì(249 [4.9%] ±È 224 [4.4%]; ÿ1000 Ãû¸¾Å®Ã¿Ä꣺9.5 ±È 8.6 ; Σº¦±È£º 1.10; 95% ÖÃÐÅÇø¼ä£º0.92 - 1.32; P = .30 ) ÓÉÒÔÉÏ¿´³ö£¬ÔÚÁÙ´²Ê¹ÓÃÖÐÓ¦¸Ã¿¼ÂǸ¾Å®×äÖеķçÏÕÊÕÒæ±È£¬±ÈÈç×äÖв¡Ê·»ò¶ÌÔÝÐÔ È±Ñª·¢×÷¡¢ÐÄ·¿²ü¶¯¡¢¸ßѪѹ»òÊÇ·ñÎüÑ̵ȡ£ÔÚÑо¿ÖÐûÓй۲쵽ÐÄѪ¹Ü·½ÃæµÄºÃ´¦ £¬ËùÒÔÀ×ÂåÎô·Ò²»Ó¦ÊÇÊ×Ñ¡»ò´ÎÑ¡µÄÔ¤·ÀÐÄѪ¹Ü¼²²¡µÄÒ©Îï¡£ À×ÂåÎô·ÒÊÇÓÃÀ´Ô¤·ÀºÍÖÎÁƾø¾ºó¸¾Å®µÄ¹ÇÖÊÊèËÉÖ¢µÄÒ©Îï¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁÏ¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Ó¢Ò»ÊýÒ»408£¬×Ü·Ö284£¬¶þÕ½Õæ³ÏÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
085410 Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211 22408·ÖÊý359Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
271Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
385·Ö ÉúÎïѧ£¨071000£©Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸°²»Õ´óѧ¼ÆËã»ú¿ÆÑ§Óë¼¼Êõѧ˶£¬331·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
318Çóµ÷¼Á£¬¼ÆËã²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
291Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©¿Æ¼¼´óѧ085601²ÄÁϹ¤³ÌÓ¢Ò»Êý¶þ³õÊÔ×Ü·Ö335Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
2Â¥2007-11-11 20:26:38














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥