24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xiaoshuwp

铜虫 (正式写手)

应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: 376.6
红花: 1
帖子: 303
在线: 38.8小时
虫号: 1473753
注册: 2011-11-03
性别: GG
专业: 园艺学与植物营养学

[交流] 连续投出两篇SCI论文，希望有好消息！

博士毕业后，整了两篇SCI，希望有好消息。目前状态都是under review，为自己祈福！

————————————————————————————————————————
谢谢大家的祝福，让大家有些失望了，今天收到主编回信，令人沮丧！
I am sorry for my late correspondence. The manuscript has been evaluated by two reviewers who are well-reputed specialists in this field of research. I enclose reports from them.
Although reviewer #1 thought the manuscript was enough quality, reviewer #2 felt that the objectives of the study are not obvious and the sampling methods are poorly defined. I mostly agree with the reviewer #2's comments.
两个审稿人都给出了很多意见，一个认为都是小问题，稍作修改就行，一个认为属于试验设计问题，列出7条weaknesses没得改机会，哎！看来试验设计很重要！我有两篇遇到此问题了。其实这篇我就是投了个short communication，因为我本人预料到了试验设计比较小气，算是一个小小的尝试型的试验，所以也没有整成regular paper。没想到还是被审稿人抓住了。只能希望另一篇好运了。oh my god, bless me!

[ Last edited by xiaoshuwp on 2013-8-1 at 11:17 ]

回复此楼