| 查看: 1967 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
几乎同一天，两篇稿子被拒。 已有11人参与
|
|||
|
1、Although this study may affirm or expand on available literature, we do not feel that the paper contains sufficient new or novel information to assign a high enough priority in this area, as required for full review. 2、If you look at the Journal guidelines on the web or browse some recent issues, you will see that we are interested in the methodological aspects of medical and health research. While your paper does talk about some important methodological issues, the methods you describe are fairly simple and your approach is based on simulation, which is difficult to generalize. Some of the statements you make regarding the commonly used approaches to treatment allocation seem naive as well. There has been a great deal written on this topic in recent years. From a presentation perspective, there are also some issues with your paper. For example, the logical flow is awkward in places and there are a number of typos in your paper. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
溴的反应液脱色
已经有6人回复
-
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？
已经有8人回复
-
纳米粒子粒径的测量
已经有7人回复
-
常年博士招收(双一流，工科)
已经有4人回复
-
推荐一本书
已经有10人回复
-
参与限项
已经有5人回复
-
有没有人能给点建议
已经有5人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
jeffsion414
至尊木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 13 (小学生)
- 金币: 10801.2
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 374
- 在线: 274小时
- 虫号: 905616
- 注册: 2009-11-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境工程
好好修改，总有可以接受的期刊。楼主加油，雄起~~~ 
12楼2013-08-02 21:20:05
2楼2013-07-30 19:58:59
3楼2013-07-30 21:45:18
4楼2013-07-30 22:21:16