| 查看: 2348 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
几乎同一天，两篇稿子被拒。 已有11人参与
|
|||
|
1、Although this study may affirm or expand on available literature, we do not feel that the paper contains sufficient new or novel information to assign a high enough priority in this area, as required for full review. 2、If you look at the Journal guidelines on the web or browse some recent issues, you will see that we are interested in the methodological aspects of medical and health research. While your paper does talk about some important methodological issues, the methods you describe are fairly simple and your approach is based on simulation, which is difficult to generalize. Some of the statements you make regarding the commonly used approaches to treatment allocation seem naive as well. There has been a great deal written on this topic in recent years. From a presentation perspective, there are also some issues with your paper. For example, the logical flow is awkward in places and there are a number of typos in your paper. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有13人回复
-
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有6人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有11人回复
-
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有15人回复
-
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有4人回复
-
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了，离AI做有机合成还有多远？
已经有13人回复
-
课题组会帮你通过考核么？
已经有7人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
11楼2013-08-02 19:59:52
2楼2013-07-30 19:58:59
3楼2013-07-30 21:45:18
4楼2013-07-30 22:21:16
200