| 查看: 2014 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
几乎同一天，两篇稿子被拒。 已有11人参与
|
|||
|
1、Although this study may affirm or expand on available literature, we do not feel that the paper contains sufficient new or novel information to assign a high enough priority in this area, as required for full review. 2、If you look at the Journal guidelines on the web or browse some recent issues, you will see that we are interested in the methodological aspects of medical and health research. While your paper does talk about some important methodological issues, the methods you describe are fairly simple and your approach is based on simulation, which is difficult to generalize. Some of the statements you make regarding the commonly used approaches to treatment allocation seem naive as well. There has been a great deal written on this topic in recent years. From a presentation perspective, there are also some issues with your paper. For example, the logical flow is awkward in places and there are a number of typos in your paper. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
CSC & MSCA 博洛尼亚大学能源材料课题组博士/博士后招生｜MSCA经费充足、排名优
已经有6人回复
-
天津大学招2026.09的博士生，欢迎大家推荐交流（博导是本人）
已经有4人回复
-
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有8人回复
-
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗
已经有3人回复
-
退学或坚持读
已经有28人回复
-
面上项目申报
已经有3人回复
-
酰胺脱乙酰基
已经有9人回复
-
博士延得我，科研能力直往上蹿
已经有7人回复
-
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有5人回复
-
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有22人回复
11楼2013-08-02 19:59:52
2楼2013-07-30 19:58:59
3楼2013-07-30 21:45:18
4楼2013-07-30 22:21:16