|
[求助]
今天收到一教授回复,请大家帮忙分析下该如何回复
今天早上终于盼来了两天前发出的邮件的回复,套的这个教授终于回信了,因为我本人做的方向和他们做的非常相近,并且这个教授我也关注了好长时间了,想读博的时候去他们那边。前两天就根据我自己最近的一些研究现象来询问这位教授,今天终于回复了,但是现在不知道该怎么回复。请大家帮帮忙,支支招吧,谢谢了!
下面是教授的回复信:
Dear ***,
Thank you for your note. It sounds like you're asking me to help interpret your result and to suggest research directions. This is typically the role of a PhD advisor. Who are you working for and is your advisor giving your guidelines as to the direction of your study? I'm happy to answer questions regarding the papers we published and help reproduce those results. However, given that I need to advise my own group and I have only a finite amount of time, I can't spend too much time otherwise advising students who do not work in my group or who are not part of a group that has a more formal collaboration with me. I'm sorry about that, but I trust that you receive good advice and guidance from your professor. My two general comments are that (i) you need to be careful as to whether Tersoff potential can capture fracture and mechanical properties (as I said before, because the potential needs to have interactions between 2nd nearest neighbors to be able to capture dislocations, which are very important for mechanical properties. ZBL potential does not fix this problem. Rather it is used to help with interactions at very short distances for the purpose of studying radiation damage). (ii) if you think you're really seeing the dependence of mechanisms on the system size, you may want to look at the literature on size effects in plasticity. There are many studies that fall in the general area of deformation in small volumes (including nanopillars etc). Some papers you may want to loo up are those by William Nix and Julia Grier. In addition, you should repeat your simulations with different initial conditions to make sure that what you're observing is statistically relevant.
Good luck,
****
这个是那位教授的回复信,我不知道是否现在就回复说想去他那里读Phd呢,还是怎么样,感觉直接这样说有点不太好吧。
纠结中…… |
» 猜你喜欢
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
|