24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

whuliuting

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 5 (幼儿园)
金币: 1832.3
帖子: 818
在线: 495小时
虫号: 527295

[交流] 又是大修，不知怎么修改了

7月8号收到大修意见，现在想了半个月，也不知怎么进行更深入的研究，黔驴技穷了啊。求解
如下式审稿二的意见，一三审稿人给的是好的回复。
Reviewer #2: The authors did not address most of my comments satisfactory. Here are my detail responses to their responses。
For response 2, I don't think analysis the coefficient of K is considered to be a deep analysis。
For response 4, I don't think that the results can provide deeper insights.
Other comments:
The authors should put more effort to the second part to have a significant contribution for publication。
编辑意见：
Comments from the AE:

Please respond carefully to the comments of reviewer 2. Unless this reviewer is satisfied I will not recommend publication.

Best regards

MYJ
真不知道数值试验还要再怎么深入。向各位请教一下，可不可以向编辑发邮件咨询审稿人2的联系方式，向他请教具体的意见呀？只要告诉我怎样加深分析和洞察即可。

回复此楼