第一次投稿,投的NeuroImage。今天查状态,文章到“Submissions with a decision”一栏去了,进去看“Current Status”显示“Accept”,点开Decision letter,内容如下:
Ms. No.: NIMG-XX-XXXX
Title: XXXX....
Corresponding Author: XXX;Authors: XXX
Dear Prof. XXX,(我导师名字)
第一段:We are very pleased to inform you that your manuscript referenced above has been accepted for publication in NeuroImage.
第二段:If you have a color figure not submitted with this manuscript, but pertaining to it, that you wish to be considered for cover art in the issue in which your article will appear, please send the figure to Sonji Dawson at ni@elsevier.com.
第三段:The format should be: PPT, TIFF (300dpi), JPEG, or DOC file; RGB color. Please include a brief legend (< 50 words). We look for cover art pictures to be visually striking and original in composition. If your figure is selected, you will receive a letter stating the month and volume of the issue that the figure will appear.
第四段:When your paper is published on ScienceDirect, you want to make sure it gets the attention it deserves. To help you get your message across, Elsevier has developed a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown (publicly available) next to your published article. This format gives you the opportunity to explain your research in your own words and attract interest. You will receive an invitation email to create an AudioSlides presentation shortly. For more information and examples, please visit http://www.elsevier.com/audioslides.
Many thanks for submitting your paper to NeuroImage. We look forward to receiving further papers from you in the future.
With kind regards,
XXX(编辑)
Guest Editor
NeuroImage
NeuroImage Editorial Office
Elsevier, Inc.
525 B Street, Suite 1800
San Diego, CA 92101-4495
USA
Phone: (619) 699-6354
Fax: (619) 699-6211
E-mail: ni@elsevier.com
To receive e-mail table of content alerts for NeuroImage, register now by following the links at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/alerts
***********************
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #3: Thank you for taking the time to address my concerns so carefully and thoroughly. At this point, I'm satisfied with how my review has been addressed.
I think that the paper will be a nice contribution to the field once published and I wish the authors success moving forward with this line of research. I will be particularly interested to see the results of any future studies using similar analyses during XXXX(审稿人建议的后续实验).
附:投稿经历
2013.2.20投稿,大概4月初来信说Major revision,其间under review日期变过一次,看信发现有三个审稿人,第一个接受,第二个反对,所以找了审稿人3.第三个审稿人希望发表,但有两个Major concerns,还有十几个minor concerns。
五月初修回,五月底来信说,还是Major revision,第一个审稿人接受,第二个还是反对,说我没有按他的意思改,他在第一轮里说要用别的方法对数据处理,我们当时是解释了本方法的新意,没有正面回答。第三个审稿人说可以接受,但前面提到的一个Major concern回答不够彻底。这一次,针对第二个审稿人,我用他提的方法重新处理了数据(虽然工作量很大),结果和我们方法的部分结果一致,我把结果、过程都写到response,没有写到文章,因为说实话他说的方法只能得到部分结果,也就是说我们的方法对数据有更深入的理解,如果把他说的方法写进去文章会很冗长。针对第三个人,认真读他每一句话,按他的意思彻底仔细改论文。6月27日修回,直到今天,就是上述情况。
经验:1,整体其实并没有特别的感觉,文章投出去我也很少看状态,一般两三天看一次。可能心态放松点反而好。
2,写文章要仔细,包括文献的引用等,说话的语气什么的要特别注意。
3,对审稿人的意见一定要认真回复,每句话不放过。到现在我也不知道第二个审稿人同不同意接收(他语气一直很硬),但要相信编辑能看到我们的努力。
另外,请教各位一些问题,希望能为小弟解惑:
请问1,文章是接受了吧,目前导师没联系我,好像还没收到邮件。
2,文章接受之后要做什么,以后如果要证明材料如何证明文章被SCI检索,大概要多久。
3,第二段是什么意思?是客套话还是真的可以作为封面,如果是,图片一般怎么弄。
4,第四段什么意思?没看明白
5,审稿人3对文章好像评价很高?要不要回复什么。
6,这个杂志怎么样,有没有了解的专家们回答一下小弟。听导师说还可以就投了。 |