| ²é¿´: 451 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
ЦЦºóÉúÒø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÖúÂÛÎÄÖеÄÒ»¾äÓ¢ÎÄ·Òë
|
||
|
¡°ÔÚ±¾ÎÄÃèÊöµÄͨÐÅÁ÷³ÌÖУ¬¡°A¡úB£ºM¡±±íʾͨÐÅʵÌåAÏòͨÐÅʵÌåB·¢ËÍSIPÏûÏ¢M {M}SignID ±íʾʹÓÃÓû§IDµÄ˽Կ¶ÔSIPÏûÏ¢MÖеÄÒ»Ð©ÖØÒªÍ·Óò½øÐÐ2.1½ÚÃèÊöµÄÇ©ÃûÔËË㡱 ÇëÎÊ´ó¼Ò£¬Õâ¾ä»°ÓÐɶ±È½ÏºÃµÄ·Òëû£¿ лл£¡ [ Last edited by ЦЦºóÉú on 2013-7-20 at 21:06 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±Àí¹¤298Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
291 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
307Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏרҵ344Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
362Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
0856ר˶Çóµ÷¼Á Ï£ÍûÊÇaÇøÔºÐ£
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤300Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ34È˻ظ´

hyt0615
½ð³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- ·ÒëEPI: 14
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1472.8
- Ìû×Ó: 50
- ÔÚÏß: 31.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2434650
- ×¢²á: 2013-04-24
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ·ÖÎöÒÇÆ÷ÓëÊÔ¼Á
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
phu_grassman: ½ð±Ò+2, thanks 2013-07-25 16:40:26
ЦЦºóÉú(phu_grassman´ú·¢): ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1, thanks for your help 2013-12-03 08:37:12
phu_grassman: ½ð±Ò+2, thanks 2013-07-25 16:40:26
ЦЦºóÉú(phu_grassman´ú·¢): ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1, thanks for your help 2013-12-03 08:37:12
|
"the communication process described in this paper," A ¡ú B: M "indicated that a SIP message M was sended from the communication entity A to B. {M} SignID indicated that the private key of the user ID was used to signed-calculate a number of important header fields in the SIP message M described in the section 2.1. " µÚ¶þ¾ä»¹ÓдýÉÌȶ¡£ |
2Â¥2013-07-22 12:28:29













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥