| 查看: 106 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价1次,作者wangye增加金币 0.25 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
Old Physics for New: a worldview alternative to Einstein's relativity theory
|
||
|
By Thomas E., Jr. Phipps Publisher: C. Roy Keys Inc. Number Of Pages: 258 Publication Date: 2006-12-01 Sales Rank: 202037 ISBN / ASIN: 0973291141 EAN: 9780973291148 Binding: Paperback Manufacturer: C. Roy Keys Inc. Studio: C. Roy Keys Inc. Average Rating: 5 From the author of Heretical Verities, a study more sharply focused on the sins of relativity theory. Where physicists see transcendent beauty, Phipps finds institutionalized ugliness. Where field theorists have eyes only for the glitter of Maxwell and Einstein, he commends the subtler attractions of the Cinderella of modern electromagnetic theory, Heinrich Hertz. Review: Not just another relativity slam. Phipps has the good fortune to actually have been a practicing Phd physicist. Having been forced into the mold of lock step physics, he has, upon retirement, let loose pent up frustrations that must have festered over time. Fortunately for us, he is a master at the use of the language and this artifice allows a rather uncharacteristic eloquence to his verbage that would attract any reader in search of english written in a form that is all but dormant. The book would be a pleasurable read from this point alone were it not for the pressing need to have things put aright by the author in the areas of physics not so deeply trodden in our modern age. Phipps doesn't attack relativity directly, as so many do in a rabid fashion of late, but does us the honor of showing how much of its "bed rock", Maxwellian electrodynamics, was allowed to lead physics off track. This bed rock did not get fully corrected by the time Einstein did his work. Phipps gives us a much needed history lesson which is so often overlooked in modern science. He shows errors in many works, and later attempted corrections that ultimately went begging or that complicated, needlessly, issues that might have been handled in a wiser, more direct fashion. He does not let words alone speak for physics, but involves us in the mathematics to a level that only those deeply involved might follow to full advantge. Yet as an electrical engineer, I perservered and gained real insights to work that normally is left to higher level physicists. Phipps takes a delightful relish in pointing out issues that are just not right on the path to modern accepted relativistic physics. The reader will love his powerful use of the language in finger pointing and following up on faux pas on the part of his fellow physicists. The book is a must read for those willing to think a bit deeper and allow a physicist to reveal that the veil of physics is a bit tattered and shop worn and, to its detriment,loaded with all manner of operable but poorly conceived patchwork attempts. A real eye opener, regardless of your thoughts on the matter in the end. Intellectually stimulating, eloquent, humorous in places, and very thought provoking. Review: Dissident Physics at its Best For those who are interested in views contrary to Einstein's theories of relativity, this book is a "MUST-HAVE." Phipps is without a doubt the most entertaining writer who disagrees with Einstein and his followers. Phipps appears to be someone who really and truly understands what he is talking about. If your special interest is the topic of "time," you simply must read this book. Highly recommended. If you are a die-hard Einsteinian, why not read the book and then post your critical review here for people like me? I would love to see what the official response is to ideas like these.pass: gigapedia.org http://rapidshare.com/files/6340 ... _New_0973291141.rar |
» 猜你喜欢
投稿精细化工
已经有6人回复
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有36人回复
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利,现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈?
已经有10人回复
博士申请都是内定的吗?
已经有9人回复
心脉受损
已经有8人回复
读博
已经有5人回复
★ 一星级,一般
|
好资源一定好顶 谢谢分享 看见好多人询问怎么有密码,我怎么下载不了。其实这些都是共享站点,很容易使用,但你要知道他的规则,比如Rapidshare不支持多线程,你就不能使用迅雷多线程下载等。所以只要你知道他们的下载规则,你就知道怎么下载了。 我做了一个Rapidshare、Mihd、Live-share等网盘的下载图解教程,不知道怎么下载的朋友可以到那里学习 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=591515&fpage=1 |
2楼2007-10-21 17:23:20













回复此楼