| ²é¿´: 671 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
wxqtjwÌú³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ººÒëÓ¢£¬ÇóÈóÉ«£¬Ð»Ð»´ó¼Ò
|
||
|
´Óͼ3¿ÉÖª£¬³ýÁË»ùÌåÑùÆ·ÔÚ200¡ãCûÓйյã³öÏÖ£¬µÈÀë×ÓÍ¿²ãºÍµç³Á»ýÑùÆ·¾ùÔÚ200¡ãCÓÐ×èÄá·å³öÏÖ£¬Òò´Ë£¬200¡ãCµÄ×èÄá·åµÄ³öÏÖÓ¦¸ÃÓë»ùÌåÎ޹أ¬¿ÉÄÜÓëNiÍ¿²ã»òÍ¿²ã/»ùÌåÖ®¼äµÄ½çÃæÓйء£ From Fig. 3, there was occurred damping peak at about 200¡ãC for both the LPPS and as-deposited coated samples except the substrate. It was therefore concluded that the damping peak at 200¡ãC had nothing to do with the coating microstructures, but should be related with the Ni coating or the interface between Ni coating and substrate. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
265Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085700×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¼ªÁÖ´óѧ²ÄÁÏѧ˶321Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
286·ÖÈ˹¤ÖÇÄÜרҵÇëÇóµ÷¼ÁÔ¸Òâ¿ç¿¼£¡
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
329Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÉêÇë»Ø¸åÑÓÆÚÒ»¸öÔ£¬±à¼Í¬ÒâÁË¡£µ«ÏµÍ³ÉϵÄʱ¼äû±ä£¬¸ø±à¼ÓÖдÓʼþÁË£¬Ã»»Ø¸´
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏѧ˶318Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйúº£Ñó´óѧ£¬ÉúÎïѧ£¬301·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
081700»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´

wbcui
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 29
- Ó¦Öú: 221 (´óѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.349
- ½ð±Ò: 16296.6
- É¢½ð: 359
- ºì»¨: 73
- Ìû×Ó: 8321
- ÔÚÏß: 919Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 543804
- ×¢²á: 2008-04-11
- רҵ: ½ðÊô¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1 2013-06-13 19:33:03
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1 2013-06-13 19:33:03
|
from Fig. 3, no inflecion points are observed for matrix sample at 200oC, compared with the appeard dampling peak at 200oC for both plasma coated one and electro-deposited one. therefore, the appearance of damping peak at 200oC is supposed to be due to the Ni coating layer or the interface between coating layer/matrix, rather than the matrix. ÍüÁË˵Ã÷һϣ¬²»ÖªµÀÄãµÄ»ùÌåÊÇ»ùƬ»ò³Áµ×µÄ¸ÅÄ»¹ÊǸö¿éÌåµÄ¶«Î÷£¿Èç¹ûÊÇ¿éÌåµÄ¶«Î÷£¬matrix¿ÉÄܸüºÏÊʰɣ¿ |
2Â¥2013-06-12 23:58:54













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥