| 查看: 864 | 回复: 1 | |||
zhang66163银虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
动力学模型
|
| 各位大侠，有谁知道动力学模型中，LH模型和LHHW模型，这两个模型是一样的吗？如果不一样有什么区别，谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
[武汉纺织大学]材料学院[姜伟团队名称]课题组-2026年硕士研究生调剂信息
已经有0人回复
-
中国科学院·过程工程研究所·招聘海内外高层次人才---过程所“百人计划”
已经有1人回复
-
有机高分子材料论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有74人回复
-
中国科学院·过程工程研究所·招聘海内外高层次人才---过程所“百人计划”
已经有5人回复
-
2026考博自荐
已经有4人回复
-
温敏水凝胶收缩
已经有0人回复
-
PDMS膜在溶液中的离子透过率
已经有0人回复
-
攒人品 论文祈福
已经有139人回复
-
science advances的AAAS系统上返修
已经有0人回复
-
science advances的AAAS系统上返修问题
已经有2人回复
-
LDPE黑十字为什么那么大
已经有0人回复
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★
zhang66163(houchenxmc代发): 金币+2 2013-06-15 08:33:33
houchenxmc: 回帖置顶 2013-06-15 08:33:35
zhang66163(houchenxmc代发): 金币+2 2013-06-15 08:33:33
houchenxmc: 回帖置顶 2013-06-15 08:33:35
|
While it may appear that little difference in form exists between Langmuir-Hinshelwood rate expressions and those of Hougen-Watson, it must be emphasized that the developments of Watson and Hougen prove to be far more comprehensive. For in addition to surface reaction per se, the Hougen- Watson formulations include explicit terms for catalyst activity (sites), catalyst effectiveness due to diffusion, and provision for activity decay. Further, multisite as well as adjacent- site models were anticipated. The Hougen-Watson catalytic rate equations represent not merely a modification of the Langmuir-Hinshelwood formulations but highly instructive extensions and refinements, the unique utility of which is demonstrated in the analysis and design of catalytic reactors. Chemical and Catalytic Reaction Engineering By James J. Carberry |
2楼2013-06-15 02:20:51
