24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1319  |  回复: 3

78367795

金虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 拒搞的理由是与期刊内容不符能Rebuttal不 已有3人参与

文章投optics and laser technology被拒稿了,两个Review,一个接受,一个拒搞,拒搞的理由是与期刊内容不符,想问下这种情况能Rebuttal不?会有效果不?


Reviewer #2: I think the revised vesion is Okay to be accepted.



Reviewer #3: I maintain my decision. This paper is not suitable for this journal. Moreover, both the abstract and the highlight are discriptive without numerical indicators to give clues to the ocasional readers. In fact, both are uninteresting. Figure 6 don't convince me about the suitabiliness for this high experiments-targeted journal.
The paper is very confusing to read (too much theory).
My sugestion is to submit this paper on a more targeted journal (image processing journal, e.g., on one of the journals listed in references).
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huanghuasjtu

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
这个意见很蛋疼!不好Rebuttal啊.比如The paper is very confusing to read (too much theory).怎么回答呢?我觉得没嘛希望
做科研可以讲究,也可以将就
2楼2013-05-20 10:11:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

goslar

木虫 (职业作家)

我不再应助!


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
试下问下 Editor 有没有可能再请一个新的 reviewer?!
无故被警告,非常失望,我不再应助!
3楼2013-05-20 10:19:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
4楼2013-05-20 10:28:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 78367795 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见