| 查看: 2005 | 回复: 14 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
nanoscale 小修,忘记上传graphic abstract,怎么办?
|
||
|
修改文章已经提交7天了,还在under review,焦急啊 [ Last edited by fgy on 2013-5-15 at 04:51 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
心脉受损
已经有5人回复
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有15人回复
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
读博
已经有3人回复
小论文投稿
已经有3人回复
Bioresource Technology期刊,第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了
已经有9人回复
到新单位后,换了新的研究方向,没有团队,持续积累2区以上论文,能申请到面上吗
已经有8人回复
申请2026年博士
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
nanoscale 小修后多长时间有结果?
已经有25人回复
Nanoscale小修时间限制?
已经有22人回复
调查一下IEEE Trans的论文修改后(包括大修小修),几天接受的啊?
已经有7人回复
小修后,还没接受
已经有18人回复
SCI 小修后不到一个星期接受,2012年9月28号接收,
已经有72人回复
投了 RSC advances 两个多月了,还在审稿 正常吗?
已经有32人回复
第一篇SCI接受的曲折过程:2次大修+1次小修+4次送审。
已经有223人回复
小修后 with editor要多久才能接受
已经有26人回复
food hydrocolloids 小修,多长时间能接受,(附审稿意见)
已经有11人回复
|
已经和编辑联系了,让补充上缺失文件即可。 另外,请问一下下面这句话<strong>If you have chosen Accepted Manuscript publication: </strong> Please provide a .PDF version of your revised manuscript including figures, suitable for publication online as an Accepted Manuscript (with no highlighting, track changes etc) 要求提供一个pdf版的修改后的manuscript,不用标记出修改的地方什么的 |
8楼2013-05-15 19:21:44
9楼2013-05-15 19:23:27
|
再帮忙解释一下,下面这些吧,金币全给你了 Please provide the following separate files: • A suitably revised manuscript in native format (.DOC or TeX) with high quality embedded figures OR • A suitably revised manuscript in native format (.DOC or TeX) with numbered figures, as separate files in .TIF, or .EPS format, with resolution of 600dpi or greater. Providing the original figure and scheme files in their native formats will assist us in ensuring the best quality production of your article. Please highlight the changes to your manuscript within the document by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or coloured text. • If your manuscript is in LaTeX please also provide a .PDF version including figures. • A table of contents entry. This should include: * Colour graphic: maximum size 8cm x 4cm * Text: one sentence, of maximum 20 words, highlighting the novelty of the work • Suitably revised Electronic Supplementary Information (if any) • A response to the comments made by the reviewer(s). You should also document any changes you have made to the original manuscript. In order to expedite the processing of the revised manuscript, please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s). <strong>If you have chosen Accepted Manuscript publication: </strong> Please provide a .PDF version of your revised manuscript including figures, suitable for publication online as an Accepted Manuscript (with no highlighting, track changes etc) |
11楼2013-05-15 20:02:07













回复此楼